Critique of article health insurance and safety in
Excerpt from Term Paper:
Critique of Article: Into the Safety in the Engineering Classroom
1 The type of research is detailed, to elicit statistics how prevalent safety and health instruction is in the normal college engineering curriculum.
2 . Yes, the problem is plainly stated. “The Professional Engineer’s Code of Ethics contains the responsibility ‘to hold extremely important the public basic safety, health and welfare, ‘ but several recent reports suggest that couple of undergraduate executive programs consist of any organised course material strongly related identifying environmental threats to health and handling occupational and public health and safety hazards. ” (Introduction, p. 1, par. two, lines 1-4)
3. Yes, the research inquiries are identified, albeit indirectly through the use of desks and “subsets” of the questions asked. One table data the reasons why professors do include instruction in health and safety in their classes, while the other addresses the reasons they would not include such instruction. As the questions themselves are not said, the information elicited is obviously ranked on these furniture (Tables 1 and 2, pages two to three, pars. 1-4).
4. Zero, the problem is certainly not deduced from theory nevertheless from benefits of various other studies. (Introduction, p. 1, par. a couple of, line several, and l. 6 list).
5. N/A. This is not an experimental or perhaps relational style, so not any independent factors were defined.
6. 1 dependent varying, as a way to obtain possible problem, was that one-third of the respondents previously got attended a National Commence for Occupational Safety and Health-sponsored workshop for architectural faculty (Discussion, p. 5, par. you, lines 2-3). These teachers, because of their attendance, may have experienced a more powerful focus on questions of safety than had all respondents either went to these training courses or been drawn from non-attendees.
7. Yes, the studies sent to the respondents protected both adverse and great situations, and gave respondents a range of response from “mildly” to “strongly” positive, to fairly neutral or bad.
8. Certainly, the population examined was evidently specified. “A questionnaire prying faculty interest in and training commitment to occupational and public health and safety was mailed to 324 undergrad engineering instructors in 112 U. T. colleges of engineering. inches (Methods, g. 1-2, similar. 4) 175 surveys were returned, which 18 had been excluded because the professors had either retired or still left the college or university setting. With the 157 that remained, 97% of faculty answering were from undergraduate courses accredited by Accreditation Board for Architectural and Technology, representing 66 colleges of engineering (Methods, p. 2, par. one particular, lines 13-16).
9. Certainly, the sampling methods were clearly layed out. The examples were divided into three teams; one group had joined National Commence for Work-related Safety and Health workshops; one group was chosen from the same universities and fields as those prior, only from non-attendees; and the third group was random (Methods