The theme of corruption in the tragedy of hamlet

Essay Topic: Doctor Faustus,

Paper type: Society,

Words: 1270 | Published: 04.15.20 | Views: 381 | Download now

The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by Shakespeare and Doctor Faustus by Christopher Marlowe have many elements of drama in common, including the theme of corruption, both equally morally and politically.

The similarities in theme between your two plays is exceptional with respect to the concept of the corruption. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Knight in shining armor of Denmark and Doctor Faustus both equally feature multi-faceted, ambitious key characters that support one of the major themes of the plays: problem. Doctor Faustus blatantly exhibits the concept of the corruption, the two morally and politically.

Faustus, at the beginning of the play, attempts magical powers and features numerous ideas on how to utilize power this individual seeks, just like gaining immense wealth, learning the mysteries of the whole world, and remaking the map of The european countries. However , when Faustus offered his spirit to Lucifer in exchange for the power this individual longed to get, he abandoned his plans and became quite happy with performing conjuring tricks to get kings. Faustus’s behavior at this time in the perform does not appear like wickedness, although instead mediocrity.

The ability Faustus gained made him content becoming a minor celeb instead of the grand plan developer with relatively limitless goal.

Faustus was morally dangerous when he sold his spirit to Lucifer in exchange pertaining to power. The play has a decidedly religious framework, in addition to this one can easily argue that success can only be achieved through God’s love. Faustus was ruined to mediocrity because be cut himself off from God’s love. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark also exhibits the concept of the corruption, the two morally and politically, however it is more refined than in Doctor Faustus. In Hamlet, Claudius, Prince Hamlet’s uncle, can be corrupted simply by power. This individual murdered King Hamlet, became the Ruler of Denmark himself, and married the previous king’s wife Gertrude.

Claudius was an ambitious and manipulative innovator. He was determined to hold on to his power, in the end at the expense of his lifestyle. Prince Hamlet was morally corrupted by ghost of his dad. The ghosting of Hamlet’s father provided Hamlet with evidence it turned out Claudius who murdered him. After delivering Hamlet with evidence, the ghost beseeched Hamlet to get revenge on Claudius. Hamlet vows to avenge his father’s loss of life, and turns into obsessed with demonstrating Claudius’s sense of guilt. The ghost’s request corrupts Hamlet to the point where all Hamlet can consider is getting payback on Claudius.

Hamlet is known as a contemplative persona, essentially proficient at heart. He would have never thought about avenging his father’s loss of life if the ghost had not mentioned it, and therefore would not have already been corrupted. Faustus and Claudius’s greed for power brought on their own corruption, while Hamlet was dangerous by an outdoor force. Faustus was driven to the point where this individual became captivated with obtaining magical powers. This obsession with magical capabilities led him to sell his soul to Lucifer, breaking contact with Our god. Everyone besides Faustus appeared to realize that selling a heart and soul to Lucifer was an extremely bad idea.

Even Mephastophilis, the vermittler between Lucifer and Faustus, tried to retain Faustus via selling his soul, stating, “O Faustus, leave these frivolous demands.  (Marlowe 1604/1994, 3. 81). Faustus was morally and politically corrupted, and refused to follow the path to redemption. Claudius’s ambition led him to murder California king Hamlet, his own close friend, and get married to the Princess or queen of Denmark, ensuring that this individual, not Hamlet, would gain the power that went along with being king. Claudius’s greed pertaining to power created his very own destruction.

For instance , to ensure that Hamlet would expire, and therefore struggle to take the throne from Claudius, Claudius not simply had two weapons, the sword as well as the poison around the sword, however the poisoned goblet as well. Got the poisoned goblet not really existed, Gertrude would never possess died, and Hamlet will still have been unable to decide in the event that he was gonna go through while using revenge storyline or not, dying prior to Claudius was dead. Yet , the death of his mother dispatched Hamlet over the edge, and Claudius suffered the effects of his own plot (Shakespeare 1603/1992, 5.

2). Hamlet, on the other hand, was totally different from Faustus and Claudius. Hamlet was morally corrupted by an outside power: the ghost. The ghost told Hamlet, “Revenge his foul and a lot unnatural killer.  (Shakespeare 1603/1992, 1 ) 5. 31) Hamlet’s like for his father and the grief that he felt at the decrease of his father forced him to vow to avenge his father’s death. Doctor Faustus exhibited the concept of the corruption within a religious approach, while The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark viewed the theme of corruption within a relatively human way.

Faustus sold his soul to the devil to achieve the power this individual sought, when the time came for Faustus to participate Lucifer in hell, this individual begged intended for God to redeem him. Faustus wailed, “My God, my Our god, look not fierce upon me!  (Marlowe 1604/1994, 13. 111). Faustus broke from God’s love for mediocrity, and he in the end had to shell out the price. Hamlet experienced problem in more of your human approach. For example , Hamlet had to be sure that Claudius was guilty ahead of he would exact his revenge. Even when Hamlet was convinced that Claudius was the murderer, he continue to could not provide himself to harm Claudius (Shakespeare 1603/1992, 3.

2, 3. 3). Hamlet reasoned with him self, not with The almighty, during these times. Although Hamlet was morally corrupted, it was not in a religious perception. The Misfortune of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark involved indecisiveness and human mistake, not religious beliefs such as Doctor Faustus. William Shakespeare and Captain christopher Marlowe both portrayed power in a bad light, mailing the message that electric power can cause wonderful pain and anguish for those who seek this obsessively. Faustus sold his soul for the devil, whilst Claudius murdered members of his friends and family for electric power.

Claudius demonstrates he is fanatical with electric power in the second scene in the first action when he will not let Hamlet go back to the university in Wittenberg. Hamlet, when alone, thinks about committing suicide, “O this too as well sullied flesh would burn, thaw, and resolve alone into a dew!  (Shakespeare 1603/1992, 1 . 2 . 133-134). Faustus was also triggered great soreness due to seeking power obsessively. Faustus ultimately had to spend eternity in hell. The pain because of the obsessive need for power triggered great discomfort for equally Faustus, Claudius, and Hamlet.

The theme of corruption, the two morally and politically, enjoyed an important function in the two Tragedy of Hamlet, Royal prince of Denmark and Doctor Faustus. The characters of Faustus, Claudius, and Hamlet all skilled loss for that reason corruption. Faustus and Claudius were greedy for capacity to the point where Faustus lost his soul and Claudius dropped his life. Hamlet was morally dangerous by the ghosting to the point where this individual became obsessed with proving Claudius’s guilt. The authors of the plays sent the message that obsessiveness only contributes to anguish. The moral from the plays is that everything ought to be kept in moderation.

You may also want to consider the following: go over doctor faustus as a tragedy, the royal prince and the pauper theme, doctor faustus being a tragedy

1

Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!

Get My Essay