Conceptual framework article

Paper type: Finance,

Words: 978 | Published: 12.30.19 | Views: 514 | Download now

A conceptual construction of accounting can be considered as a normative theory of accounting. A conceptual framework makes prescriptions to what the objectives of accounting are, what qualitative qualities general-purpose monetary information will need to possess, how the elements of accounting should be identified and when they must be recognised and just how the portions of accounting needs to be measured. The lovely view often advertised by several advocates of conceptual structure projects is the fact it is difficult and perhaps illogical to produce systems of financial accounting whenever we do not at first agree on essential issues such as what general purpose financial revealing is, what the objective of any general purpose financial reporting method is and in regards to this, the particular qualitative attributes of the info generated as a result system must be.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Even more, to make the program consistent we have to agree on the way you define, recognize and gauge the elements of that system. The lovely view taken is that there are a number to build blocks involved in developing a reasonable system of accounting and that a conceptual framework develops this sort of building blocks in a logical buy.

For example , we at first need several consensus within the definition of general purpose financial confirming and of a reporting entity, before we are able to consider the goal of financial confirming. Once we have considered the objective of monetary reporting we can then consider defining the qualitative attributes of financial revealing, as well as how you can define the elements of financial reporting and so forth.

Without a few consensus in issues just like those stated earlier, it is likely that the development of rules of accounting (assuming that we want rules) will probably be undertaken in a rather piecemeal manner with limited regularity between the different rules (which raises an additional issue: can we need regularity? ). This inconsistency were the case around the globe prior to the advancement conceptual frameworks. There was quite a lot of inconsistency between your various standards in terms of meanings (often implied) of the components of accounting, and inconsistencies in determining when the elements ought to be recognised and just how they should bemeasured. With a conceptual framework, the accounting criteria are expected being more consistent.

Across period, the accounting profession fascinated a great deal of critique for deficiency of agreement on key issues”so from a ‘legitimacy’ perspective, the career probably required a conceptual framework.

The us, the United Kingdom, Down under, Canada and New Zealand had almost all put significant efforts into developing a conceptual framework yet much of this work is now being overtaken by the revised conceptual construction project becoming undertaken with each other by the Usa States’ Monetary Accounting Specifications Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). As Down under has agreed to adopt the accounting standards issued by the IASB it also had to undertake the IASB conceptual construction in to preserve consistency.

A number of the advantages that have been advanced pertaining to conceptual frames of accounting include:

Accounting standards manufactured by applying the contents of the conceptual structure should be consistent and rational. Because many countries allow us conceptual frames that are comparable (or they have adopted the IASC framework) there should be better international compatibility between different countries’ accounting rules, and this should bring about greater uniformity and comparability between foreign financial reviews (which some people have asserted is important intended for flows of foreign expenditure capital). Since conceptual frames provide the fundamentals of an accounting system, standard-setters should be even more accountable for all their decisions.

If they deviate from essential issues tackled in a conceptual framework this will be clear plus some explanation can be necessary. Conceptual frameworks offer a means of interacting key principles to economic report preparers and users, as well as featuring guidance to reporting agencies when simply no specific specifications address a specific issue. Mainly because issues like the objective of economic reporting, acknowledgement criteria (and so on) have been identified when having a conceptualframework, then simply accounting standard-setters will be be subject to less politics pressure when developing fresh standards. Since standard-setters may have consensus on many essential issues, the introduction of accounting standards should be more economical. There will be you should not go back to the ‘drawing board’ on various fundamental problems.

Some of the disadvantages that have been associated with conceptual frames of accounting include:

Conceptual frameworks happen to be costly to develop. The advancement conceptual frames is subject to political interference”some people (for example, Hines) argue that conceptual frameworks will be no more than residue of a political process. Linked with the above point, when conceptual frameworks have got attempted to consider issues by which there is much underlying difference (for model, measurement issues), they have maintained to lose progress. Following on from the above level, conceptual frameworks have maintained not to take on difficult concerns.

Conceptual frames focus on monetary (financial) overall performance alone. As a result, they tend to ignore other aspects of performance (for model, the interpersonal and environmental performance of any reporting entity). Further, by focusing on economic performance exclusively and by creating prominence, conceptual frameworks often deflect attention away from various other important aspects of corporate performance. They signify a codification of existing practice and don’t provide suitable methods of accounting. They simply act to get a means of legitimising a profession below threat.

Whether we agree to or decline the above advantages or drawbacks of conceptual frameworks will really be based on our own personal opinions and beliefs.

You may also be interested in the next: conceptual structure about broken family, conceptual framework of broken friends and family


Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!

Get My Essay