Criticizing american exceptionalism in editha

Essay Topic: This story,

Paper type: Literary works,

Words: 927 | Published: 01.10.20 | Views: 513 | Download now

Short Tale

William Leader Howells openly opposed the Spanish-American War of 1898, believing it turned out more of an evasive make an effort by the United States to achieve territorial and economical expansion of Spanish impérialiste nations just like Cuba plus the Philippines, instead of an indefinitely unselfish effort to free Cuba by Spain. In “Editha”, Howells characteristically shows the contrasting opinions of these who backed the conflict, and those who also denounced this. Although it is never specifically stated to have been the Spanish-American War that this story revolves around, it has been broadly accepted the story’s political context corresponds and shows that of the 1898 conflict against Spain.

While an advocate of Leo Tolstoy’s ” the Russian novelists’ ” ideas of nonviolence, Howells proved simply no reluctance in condemning warfare or physical violence of all kinds. He remarkably conveys his antipathetic opinions of warfare through the leading part, Editha, by painting her as a shallow individual, 1 with no thoughts of her own, who will be quick to echo chauvinistic phrases from the newspapers. The girl with introduced as a woman in whose engagement to 1 George Gearson had been made a decision “without, since it were, thinking”. What is selected however , is that “she acquired always supposed that the person who gained her would have done something to get her, the girl did not know very well what, but a thing. ” This kind of fairy-tale-like certainty outlines her childish and naïve mindset which is highlighted by her elation in the start of war. In Editha’s viewpoint, George going off to fight within a war is paralleled to him preventing for Editha’s love. With her, fighting gallantly in the conflict would be his act to do “something worthwhile to have received her ” be a main character, her hero”, without truly considering the implications ” the actual enormity of war’s implications as a result of her romanticizing tips of battlefield glory.

On the other hand, George patently provides hiding for anti-war and anti-violence statements which, however, are which may have no effect or bear any relevance in the story as his opinions will be ignored by simply Editha and the rest of culture. When he expected to bring throughout the enthusiasm during a meeting intended for enlisting men into the military services at the city hall simply by attempting to “sprinkle a little chilly water about them [the young men volunteering]” being a joke, George only wound up “sprinkling hell-fire on them” instead, consequently only causing the fire flames of patriotism within the getting together with to burn even fiercer. Moreover, when Editha initially begins to coax him in to fighting in the war, George utters, “with a obscure smile, as though musing out loud, “Our nation ” right or wrong! “” which is obviously a sarcastic remark intended to mock the extremely chauvinistic belief that America can be “a nation that can’t be wrong, but if it is, is right, anyway! inches

George continually chastise the war through the story regardless of his submitter to this ” his yielding certainly not by choice but by simply force by his much loved Editha as well as the American community. He queries and doubts the mainstream notion this war is a “holy war” which “God [had] supposed it being war”. After his initially signs of surrendering to society’s expectations of gender jobs, he says to Editha, “I’ll try to believe in your pocket Providence”: the definition of which he uses to suggest that this specific Providence that everyone is and so sure of can be not the true Lord, that it is only a conception of Providence. After enlisting in the army George goes to announce to Editha his appointed position while captain of Company A. In a drunken state, this individual gaily proclaims that he’s going to war, “the big war, the wonderful war, the holy warfare ordained by pocket Charité that blesses butchery”. With this unquestionably sarcastic declaration, George incongruously glorifies the war in its atrocities, implying his honest views regarding war to be that corresponding to butchery, that war decreases man to animals within a slaughterhouse.

Regardless of every his sarcastic remarks, Editha, like all others fervently helping the conflict, is hard of hearing to notice his implications and pays simply no heed to his authentic emotions and opinions. Contemporary society only cares that he is going to war and guard their region which patriots like Editha claim: “there is no exclusive chance above America”. She even places her love for her country above her appreciate for George as the lady writes in a letter to him, “But the man My spouse and i marry need to love his country first of all”. These kinds of phrases and sentences focus on the magnitude of America’s sense of nationalistic righteousness.

The idea that America “can’t be wrong, but if it really is, is right, anyway” epitomizes the strong opinion of American exceptionalism which William Dean Howells is evidently criticizing through “Editha”. As how Howells had wished to use his position as editor for the Multicultural as a forum for his increasingly radical political views, he expresses these kinds of political views through this story. Just like George, Howells was overlooked for propounding America’s imperialistic ambitions, nevertheless his visible works such as “Editha” absolutely gained acknowledgement by tough readers to question the country’s blind propaganda, to reflect on if Americans could mindlessly support such divulgación like Editha, or contemplate on the truth and reality of the data like George.

Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!