Doing everything you believe in a source

Ayn Seite, Fountainhead, The Fountainhead

Perhaps one of the most potent techniques to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses of a leading part, a foil illuminates the meaning of a work with character stability and important juxtaposition. Inside the Fountainhead, Ayn Rand without a doubt makes use of these kinds of a foil, by the name of Dominique Francon, to create out the unique characteristics and qualities of Howard Roark into the spotlight, thus showcasing the very beliefs he symbolizes: objectivism. Although both Dominique and Roark represent the essence of Rand’s model of selfishness that the girl attempts, and succeeds, to convey, the contrasting manner in which that they present themselves to society shows the potential of Rand’s philosophy in action and how this functions in the real world.

From the onset of the story, Howard Roark’s brilliant and laconic characteristics is noticeable. He is characterized with such an enormous uniqueness that emulating this very character would be difficult, in the event not impossible. His innate affinity to get architecture, a raw skill, is adversely portrayed by simply society. As being a nonconformist, he’s misunderstood by majority of world who principles opinion over art alone. In Dominique and Roark’s first encounter, her initial impression of him quickly throws the reader off-guard: his usual frosty look, which repulses other folks, immediately takes in her in, as the girl recalls a “cold brilliance” and empowering “strength” within just Roark. The lady thus is a symbol of one of the few character types that be familiar with enormity of what this individual encapsulates and truly be familiar with remarkability of individualism Rand tries to put forth. The difference Dominique offers in character shows that she’s at once strangely similar, yet a glaring counterpoint in Roark. Using a vivid knack for the facts, she genuinely appreciates art in its uncooked state and not for the fame and success it brings. Just like Roark, the lady does not ingratiate herself with others. By having an awareness of the “great” characteristics Roark owns, she herself demonstrates an awareness for Rand’s advocation of selfishness. For example, when Dominique talks about her hatred to mankind, your woman alludes into a corruption, a lack of understanding of objectivism, or the “right” way to have one’s your life. In a sense, she actually is one of the few character types with a mentality attuned to selflessness, yet she covers this selfishness because she actually is aware of the outcomes of a society that shuns. She admires what Roark is able to achieve, the simplicity at which he is able to fully however unknowingly take hold of selfishness to get art itself in overlook for outside opinion. The between the two characters recognizes its underlying in Dominique’s hesitance to seriously become a self-centered, individualistic persona because unlike Roark, she cares about how she fits in with contemporary society. She thus demonstrates a need to hide what both she and Roark have, putting an emphasis on on the far-reaching greatness that Roark signifies.

Ayn Rand utilizes Roark him self as the epitome of objectivism. The interactions between Dominique and Roark not only spotlight the qualities Roark represents, but as well the overarching concept of individualism itself and just how it is pictured by culture. By giving Roark a god-like complex, Dominique is in a sense a significantly less extreme type of Roark that is even more attuned to society. Like a conformist rather than non-conformist, the lady only inwardly displays good news in which Seite glorifies, in fear of staying “shunned” by society or perhaps misunderstood. Through Dominique’s reluctance to fully accept a selfish character, Seite suggests the discordance between general sights of culture and an individualist standpoint. She records a certain corruption within contemporary society that is not able to accept, or grasp, this kind of notion of objectivism. As expressed by Dominique, she would rather “destroy” Roark himself rather than see him get destroyed with a society that may never figure out his achievement. In a sense, the girl cannot keep to see this sort of a flawless idea receive destroyed. As a result, when your woman criticizes Roark in the story, she seemingly criticizes himself and his fine art in a very twisted manner. Probably, true fine art as an outcome of objectivism is too “beautiful” and private to be displayed in public. Dominique ultimately is a foil to Roark not only to showcase his persona, but to exhibit both an excellent concept that is certainly nowhere around suitable for a corrupted world. In essence, the originality and non-conformist within just Roark will eventually set him down.

When Dominique’s concepts of objectivism parallel with those of Flanke and focuses on on the success of Roark’s character, her behavior further more accentuates objectivism yet opposes the behavior of Roark, it really is at this point exactly where she a Roark truly diverge. Her behavior brings out the social sacrifices 1 must make for selfishness. The closing segment of the publication witnesses a character development in Dominique: once afraid of the response of culture, she after that fully ties Roark’s part, breaking her pessimistic obstacle and stripping herself of her worries. No longer prone to the retaliation of world, she reclaims her outdated job on “The Banner. ” The total circle ending truly exemplifies the success of objectivism, where Roark is portrayed as a physique high up while flying, encapsulating the of Seite (and Dominique’s) ideal, best man. In Dominique’s eye, Roark ultimately stands triumphal.

Tweet