Egoistic hedonism essay essay

Would it be unreasonable might people to sacrifice their own joys for those in poverty in other areas of the world?

“The success of his own joy is man’s highest meaningful purpose” – Ayn Flanke

Ayn Seite once cited that “The achievement of his individual happiness is usually man’s maximum moral purpose” as an egoistic hedonist we cannot help yet agree with this quote as you may know that one need to maximize their particular net enjoyment i. elizabeth. pleasure less pain.

I think that the delight of one’s self should always be over a happiness of others, if it is in our human nature to do so then do so we need to.

Egoistic Hedonism can be judged as a great ethical life-style, we know that higher happiness relates to those who follow it therefore we ought to all aspire to have the same aim, in doing therefore the more folks who do this the better. This ideal is definitely teleological. A teleological discussion is that which usually states that any decision should be based on results or perhaps consequences consequently actions include instrumental value because of what is produced.

Since it is known as a teleological argument we can declare there is a significant exclusion of ‘moral’ activities, these are appropriate as the output of these actions are validated i. elizabeth. one’s happiness. For example The Fable of Gyges. Written by Plato in book 2 of Republic this kind of story efforts to justify why a man should live a ethical life if it is an egoistic hedonist.

Through this story we learn that Gyges a shepherd has discovered a powerful band that allows person to turn unseen. Gyges makes a decision to use his power and become the selected messenger who was to be provided for the court to deliver some text to the ruler. Once he arrived he used his power to jump on the queen, in doing so he overthrew the full and believed the kingdom intended for himself. A great egoistic hedonist can’t support but think that the actions of Gyges were properly moral. Nevertheless his primary action of killing the king has not been considered meaning the end merchandise was, where he owned or operated the kingdom and satisfied his need for delight.

Let us check out a theoretical situation; John an 18-year-old teenager just graduated coming from high school. This individual wants to have the world and try new pleasures. He visits a party and sees his friends drinking and using medications. His good friends tell him that by trying these things he will gain wonderful amounts of delight. He chooses to experience for himself. One may say that what he did was ethically correct as he brought himself pleasure, ethical egoism could frown with this regardless of the ‘momentary’ pleasure that brings him. Egoistic hedonism believes one particular ought to do what satisfies all their wants in the long run. It endorses selfishness but not pure foolishness.

Egoistic Hedonism can be not an idea that is often accepted by various other philosophers. Kurt Baier states that this theory cannot be accurate as the solutions supplied result in a conflict with client positions]. He stated that we need meaningful rules as egoistic hedonism can’t resolve these clashes but only ignore these people. He chooses to use an illustration to ‘prove’ his idea. 2 applicants for a president election need to secure all their place however the only service so is usually to kill the other prospect. Baier is convinced that values can help solve a conflict with client positions].

The largest downside with this kind of ideal is that different people have different ideas in regards to what actions might be considered moral/immoral. To disprove this ideal we must consider that Baier is inexplicitly saying life is majorly consisting of conflicts where one person is intending to come out on the top. Ethical egoism embraces this ideal as it encourages person to put their demands ahead of the other folks, put simply that encourages visitors to do their finest through any kind of means, to result in a moral action – pleasure.

From this I would like to conclude by saying that Ethical Egoism is an ideal that ought to be well embraced and a theory that philosophers should not ignore. It can apply a great deal in the lives of many in today’s competitive environment. As human beings it is in our nature to strive to become the best through what ever means required, if it is in our human nature to embrace this ideal then do so we shall.

1

Tweet