Ethical Theories Essay
Ethical dilemmas certainly are a part of everyday life and the solutions presented to them are usually dependent on the ethics that govern the individual facing these people. Every person in one point in time has been confronted with a meaningful dilemma.
This is often described as the values which tend to be used to determine the proper way to handle a situation and the wrong way to go about it. Each society and community possesses its own moral index and in a few societies, an action may be seen tolerable or perhaps right, as the same actions in another community would be seen as intolerable and frowned upon. The moral index of a culture usually will go hand in hand with religious philosophy and neighborhoods which are carefully inclined to have strict rules on what is suitable behaviour and precisely what is not.
Societies which have even more secular values usually put up with extreme or perhaps eccentric patterns. The difference in opinions of various people about what is normally proper and incorrect has led to the development of various honest theories. A pair of these ideas are utilitarianism and obligation ethics. A good example of a situation which brought about several ethical stand points is definitely the Firestone Business tire recall in 1999 and 2000. The organization had learned that its newly designed firestorm Gigantic ATX, ATX II and Wilderness BY tires were defective back in 1996, after 8 from the 18 times were singled out as soon as they failed a test that tested the endurance of tires underneath high speed.
From the 14. 4 million wheels sold approximately 6. 5 million four tires had to be were recalled due to defects in the particulars which included the tread and a single steel seatbelt separating from your other metal belt and carcass The main points has led to serious and even perilous accidents while the cars overturned when the incidents occurred when they were in motion.
So that they can show big difference between utilitarianism and responsibility ethics we need to consider a great engineer employed by the company at the moment and the stand he or she might take if perhaps they fell to utilitarianism or obligation ethics Utilitarianism can be described as a great ethical theory that suggests that the action that delivers good or perhaps favorable implications to the the greater part is certainly not subject to be it right or wrong which means it is not be subject to questioning. (Fredrick, 2003) This kind of theory was greatly championed by utilitarians such as David Stuart Mill. This theory advocates pertaining to actions that produce happiness to the best or most significant number of people.
In an ideal scenario this may be feasible but generally any action can produce joy to many or possibly a few people depending on the action. The idea does not usually advocate when you use ethically correct actions constantly and thus actions which may be seen as wrong at times bring delight to a significant group of people however the actions nonetheless remain morally wrong. An engineer signing up for the utilitarianism way to our lives would have reinforced the company stand and the action it took. The business discovered that several tires had been defective and did not call to mind the rest of the auto tires that experienced already been sold.
This bring about accidents which usually caused battling and loss of life and it absolutely was not until an investigation in the cause of the accidents that finally pressured the Firestone Company to admit liability and remember the auto tires. The company would not recall the tires as it feared the losses that it would confront incase the tires were all faulty. The company made a decision to protect their profits margins at the expenditure of their clientele. (Little, 2003) As an engineer with a utilitarianism watch point this course of action would be the greatest because remembering would mean great losses and downsizing regarding job which will would mean joblessness for many people doing work at the company affecting both them and the dependants.
The work ethics proposes that the actions taken in any situation should be just and honest and respectful to any or all persons engaged. This ethical principle developments for the upholding of principles no matter to the wrong consequences whether or not they will be good or bad. (Graham, 2004) An industrial engineer working for the Firestone Organization would have chosen to recall each of the defective tires and done a through investigation for the causes of the defaults with no external pressure or the threat of regulation suits while inducement. The engineer ethical compass may have guided those to make this kind of a stand regardless to the fallout which is this case might have resulted in significant losses to the company.
In accordance with the requirements of the engineering career, this mechanical engineer was ascribed to some basic important ethics as well as the relevant professional codes of conduct whilst in the jurisdiction with their duty. These are generally guidelines geared towards providing safety standards pertaining to the technical engineers while at work and the common good from the society. Yet , the same was objectively inadequate in the Firestone’s case. Being a basic requirement, they should work out their professional skills and in addition knowledge in providing satisfaction in the standard human life. Impartiality and honesty should prevail within their service in which fidelity for the public is never compromised furthermore of consumers and also employers.
Elsewhere, engineers should go after a continuing development within their profession and bring service to their different consumers without any turmoil. These are the standard fundamentals of mechanical technicians whose effectiveness is given by the support of the canons of physical engineering. To conclude the meaning stand level taken by any individual should always be after requiring all of the necessary info. This is because atlanta divorce attorneys decision made, there are always those who love and people who benefit.
As in the Firestone, the recalling decision would have resulted in loss. After careful evaluation one should make a decision on the decision that brings nominal losses in the involved activity.
