Ethics of informed consent ethical situation

Honest Dilemmas, Legal Drinking Age group, Teen Major depression, Legal Ethics

Excerpt by Essay:

Ethics of Informed Permission

Ethical Problem: Imagine a psychologist treating a minor kid depression small cutting. Because child’s father and mother divorced, received consent handle child daddy, custodial parent or guardian. The mom ( noncustodial parent) phone calls involved boy’s treatment.

Honest dilemma: Treating a child of divorced sufferers

One of the most tough issues to get a therapist regarding the treatment of those under 18 is the problem of confidentiality. “An essential requirement of treatment is to promote an individual’s autonomy, and a fantastic pleasure of treating teenagers is to view as they arrive to enjoy their particular growing freedom. One aspect of independence is privacy. As a child grows in to adolescence and adulthood, the surrounding zone of privacy should increase, hence making space for a even more defined feeling of personal and the sense of autonomy” (Behnke Warner 2002: 44). In this instance, the custodial parent wants exclusive privileges to be involved in the treatment of the minor, as the noncustodial mother or father also desires to be involved. The daddy has special custodial privileges to a young child of unspecified age who may be under treatment for self-harm and depression. The non-custodial parent is a mother who will be an alcohol addiction, not below treatment, who have now desires to be involved in the child’s proper care.

First and foremost the duty of the therapist is to the consumer, not to both warring part of the individuals involved in the divorce. “Standard 4. 02, ‘Informed Consent to Therapy, ‘ states that after an individual are unable to provide knowledgeable consent (such as a minor), psychologists ‘consider such individual’s preferences and best interests. ‘ Standard some. 03, ‘Couple and Relatives Relationships, ‘ states that psychologists ‘attempt to clarify at the outset (1) which of the individuals are individuals or customers and (2) the relationship the psychologist will need to each person'” (Behnke Warner 2002: 44). The client is definitely not the daddy or the mother, but rather the child.

Thus, the therapist must evaluate when it is in the customer’s best interest to obtain both parents involved in the therapy, and to what degree. Whether or not both mom and dad are involved, they may not necessarily be involved at the same level. For example , the daddy may permission to treatment procedures, including medication , but the mother may be present by specific classes with the dad there or perhaps may merely consult with the therapist within the phone. Although the child cannot legally provide consent to get the mother engaged, depending upon the age and the maturity of the child, the therapist may wish to talk about the possibility of obtaining the mother involved, if the specialist feels it will probably be productive intended for the relationship.

As the law opinions consent in black-and-white terms in terms of age group, in the therapeutic relationship the child’s character, mental health status, and developmental stage must be taken into account when making decisions. If it is suited, as in the situation of an teenagers, the therapist may wish to discuss the issue of the mother’s participation or non-involvement at a meeting. If the kid is young or psychologically fragile, and the therapist believes that getting the mother linked to some facets of the children’s treatment will be helpful, she or he may wish to go over the issue with the custodial mother or father in private.

It should be noted, however , that although there is a separating line among being of age and in a position to give consent and being regarded as a small, there are no hard and fast rules regarding how to take care of minor children of divorce. “All

Tweet