Interview With Manager Essay

Essay Topic: Essay, Interview, Manager,

Paper type: Marketing,

Words: 1878 | Published: 01.14.20 | Views: 519 | Download now

Throughout the essay, the managers will be referred to as Mister X and Mr Sumado a and their company’s will be called Company X and Company Y respectively due to confidential reasons. The first manager that was interviewed in order to fulfil this was Mr X. This individual works for Company X, which is, a huge service centered organisation on the position of ‘Head of Corporate Credit Administration. ‘ His essential responsibility with this bank should be to provide credit administration support to Corporate and business, Investment bank and SME business.

Within Company X’s hierarchy Mister X seems to be a central level supervisor at he can expected to are accountable to the CEO of the business while this individual also supervises. The second interview that was conducted in this task was with Mister Y. He could be a Creative Promoting Director in Company Y which is a advertising consultancy and IT development enterprise located in Malaysia. His organisation is likewise service structured; however , this can be a medium sized 1. As a best level administrator, Mr Y’s task should be to direct and oversee the complete projects and be sure that they are carried out as planned and are powerful.

Management is the process of coordinating and overseeing the work actions of others so that their actions are finished efficiently and effectively (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012). In the subsequent dissertation, the universality of administration will be talked about in light of Fayol’s 4 functions and Katz’s 3 skills and exactly how relevant these kinds of theories seem while analysing the information obtained from the interviews. Henri Fayol proposed that that all managers perform five functions: planning, organising, powerful, coordinating and controlling (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012).

During the course of the article, however , the emphasis will stay on the several functions: organizing, organising, leading and managing. A skill is the ability either to perform a few specific behavioral task and also the ability to conduct some specific cognitive method that is functionally related to some particular job (Peterson, 2004). For the purpose of this Katz’s expertise will be linked to the interviews collected. Particularly these are: Conceptual, Human and Technical expertise.

Mr. By is involved with a modest amount of planning as he defines the credit plans for the corporate portfolio. In addition, he has to cascade the defined desired goals to individual job amounts and displays them carefully for success. In his organization, high achievers are often rewarded with accolades and money bonuses which usually serve as a motivation.

Reports are also compiled frequently to monitor collection behavior and to make sure that customer’s expectations by various events are achieved. At the same time, he’s also supposed to be able to work with various other departments to ensure smooth transactional control. These jobs of Mister.

X connect with the organizing function of Fayol, that may be, the offering of everything necessary in carrying out a particular activity i. at the. the right tools and equipment with right kind of traffic and correct amount of capital (Fayol, 1949, as reported in Lamond, 1998). Not necessarily enough to just organize the employees and assign them jobs to perform. But what is more significant is to realize that which worker is centered on which task (best suited for a particular task) and assign them careers accordingly (Fayol, 1949, as cited in Lamond, 1998). Mr.

X’s interview provides that he is the most linked to leading, managing and handling with a average amount of planning. All this is in series with the existing theories of what a midsection level supervisor ought to do. Nevertheless , he has rated controlling as ‘4′ which is somewhat high for a middle level manager. Theory says which a middle-level director is only expected to contribute 14% of his tasks to controlling (Stephen Robbins, 2012, p. 19). Mr.

By rated the necessity of human expertise as ‘5′. These skills are important for managers at all levels (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012). � Consequently, it falls into line and confirms Katz’s theory. However , Mr. X’s rating of some other two abilities and the theory related to all those seem to be contradicting as he costs technical abilities and conceptual skills while very much although according to Katz, a middle level manager can be expected to have got moderate numbers of each. Therefore, in Mr.

X’s case, Fayol’s 4 functions seem to be evident although Katz’s theory appears to not really be tightly related to his task description and tasks predicted out of him. Managers can deal with action directly, they can deal with people to encourage then to take necessary actions, and they can manage details to affect the people in turn to take their very own necessary actions (Mintzberg, 1994). Being a part of a board member, Mister.

Y statements that he could be involved in a moderate quantity of preparing (rating of ‘3′), along with, employing the correctly skilled people for a task that is best for them. Mr. Y seems that it is his responsibility, being a senior, to inspire his subordinates and offer them with the recognition that they require to be able to surpass in their respective fields. A weekly credit reporting system is utilized in Company Sumado a to check through the company’s progress and its employee’s efficiency and effectiveness.

Thus, there is certainly quite a lot of leading and handling, followed by arranging and planning is the least of them all. Fayol’s four capabilities seem to be in accordance with Mr. Y’s job explanation except for the function of controlling which in turn, for a top level manager, should be the least expensive and in this case it is ranked as a ‘5′ (very much). Technical expertise are understood to be the understanding of, or proficiency in, specific activities that need the use of particular tools, strategies, processes, techniques, techniques, or knowledge (Peterson, 2004).

Relating back to Katz’s theory, a high level director is anticipated to possess very little of specialized skills which usually contradicts with Mr. Y’s rating of ‘3′ to get technical abilities. The real functionality of the director is the understanding base in the manager (Carroll & Gillen, 1987). As being a top level manager, it truly is generally presumed that Mr.

Y really should have very much of conceptual skills which will allow him to think outside the box as he also claims that it impossible to be imaginative on require, which is a thing that his task requires of him. Conceptual skills are often thought to be needed more as the level of taking care of gets higher. In addition to this, human expertise are also essential for a supervisor at all levels. These skills permit the manager to teach, direct, and evaluate subordinates performing specialised tasks (Peterson, 2004).

Nevertheless , Mr. Y has overrated technical abilities and unappreciated conceptual expertise in relation to his job. Therefore, this contradicts with the layed out theory and Katz’s expertise come across as irrelevant while inspecting Mr.

Y’s job. Therefore, it can be figured Fayol’s capabilities are more relevant and apparent in Mister. Y’s information of his job, as compared to Katz’s theory which is mainly contradicting with the information given by Mr. Con. Although there is a few empirical support for the influence of hierarchical level and practical specialty about managerial position requirements, the influence of these factors on required skills, knowledge, and abilities continues to be more risky in mother nature (Pavett & Lau, 1983).

If administration is truly a common principle, then simply what managers do should be essentially the same whether they are top level executives or perhaps low-level administrators, in a business firm or maybe a non-profit disciplines organization…(Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012). With improvements in technology and changing ideologies, the standard definition of a business is changing along with the traditional definitions of any manager. The roles that managers play as well as the expectations that others have of them are changing to reflect new types of organization (Chapman, 2001).

During the past ten years or so, the convenience of the time-honored functions intended for classifying bureaucratic work activities has been asked by a quantity of writers (Carroll & Gillen, 1987). Commonalities can be seen between the two managers with reference to moderate numbers of planning and organising involved. Both managers also recognized man skills since highly important. These similarities could be due to both managers becoming linked with the service sector. On the other hand, there are a few evident distinctions that cannot be ignored.

Mister. X needs very much of technical abilities and conceptual skills, when Mr. Con needs simply a average amount of both. Not any significant difference can be acquired in light of Fayol’s capabilities. Mintzberg (1980) proposed that differences in managerial work require the family member importance of the roles across hierarchical level and functional specialty (Lachman, 1985).

Therefore, these differences are probably because of Mr. Times being a middle section level manager while Mr. Y is known as a top level one. Likewise, Mr. Back button comes from a public sector while Mister.

Y relates to a private 1. Furthermore, Mr. Y functions for a medium-sized organization the place that the need for specialized and conceptual skills increases very seldom which is why this individual rates it so low. On the other hand, Mr. X, doing work in a large firm rates these people higher because the circumstances will vary.

Managers in both minor and major organisations execute essentially the same activities, but how they go about them and the proportion of time they invest in each one are different (Robbins, Bergman, Stagg & Coulter, 2012). No matter their level, all managers make decisions and all managers are looked at to be executing the four functions of planning, organising, leading and controlling. Yet , the time specialized in any particular function cannot be merely explained as a reality as it is likely to vary from director to director.

After inspecting the selection interviews, it can be concluded that Fayol’s four functions are normally found to be relevant in the light of the managers interviewed, nevertheless at a varied degree. How relevamt are Katz’s skills? Evaluating the selection interviews separately, the skill sets stated will not seem to support the theory, aside from the human expertise. Although learning these skills are described and described separately, they shall be interrelated the moment enforced to managerial challenges. Therefore , looking at the general review of the functions and abilities, they appear as the universal standard for managers even though the standard of importance for every single individual function or abilities may be distinct.

Lamond, Deb,. (1998). Returning to the future: Lessons from the earlier for a fresh management time in G. Griffin (Ed. ) Administration Theory and Practice: Moving to a New Era. MacMillan: Melbourne.

3-14. Lau, A. W., & Pavett, C. M,. (1983). Managerial Job: The Affect of Hierarchical Level and Functional Niche. Academy of Management Log, 26(1), 170-177 Peterson, Capital t. (2004).

Recurring legacy of R. D. Katz: an updated typology of managing skills, Administration Decision. 42(10), 1297-1308. Robbins, S., Bergman, R., Stagg, I. & Coulter, M. (2012), Managing, (6th education. ). Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia: Pearson Education.

Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!

Get My Essay