Laws and regulations of immigration essay

Mr. E. G. Ravenstein set up a theory of human migration inside the 1880s that still forms the basis to get modern migration theory. This individual called that the “Laws of Migration”, which the catalogs have divided them in three basic categories: features of migrants, patterns of migration, and volume of migration. I believe people move to get a variety of causes, but his philosophies were basic in census effects over time making it very creditable to me and these traits of migration still display currently.

Let me discuss, within the next few paragraphs, my reasoning of why I agree with Mr. Ravenstein “laws of migration”, and just how those laws still apply today. The first general category is characteristic of migrants, which is described by book since “selective”. I am aware this category since the people that are looking for to or perhaps the people that happen to be forces to leave their homeland due to a major circumstance, not we all want to leave their homes.

Religious or political factors appear to be first choice to purchase.

For instance , Cuba includes a communist federal government that pushes people to accept the government. In which people will not agree with the government’s opinions or decisions they are prohibited to express their very own opinion. Persons from Emborrachar are power to leave the island in case the government detects that they are trying to find options to leave or perhaps trying to do something against the authorities. On the other hand, there are people in Cuba that are happy with the us government. They do not have any decider to keep the island. Additionally, they like the rules in place pertaining to the community and believed that everyone ought to follow them. Another basic category which the book describes is patters of migrants. I see this category as the pull component describes on page 17 since “to individuals attractive makes emanating from your migrants’ objective that attracts migrants”. I see the draw factor as the idea of individuals to emerge from lower income or the inability to use bought professional skills.

This concept continue to happens today, my own experience is a obvious example of it. In the years 1999 to 2006 Per� reached an economic crisis, the patters at that time was to arrive to the United States because the better future was here. My personal mother and i also came to the us back in 2000 from Spain. One of the reasons that my mother decided to arrive to the Usa State was for a better future personally. I went to Miami Seaside Senior High school, where I found a group of kids that have been from Argentina. Their parents had chose to come for the U. T. for their better future. There were many persons in Spain with professional degrees although not many with good jobs. My mom and those kids parents were persuade by idea that having a degree in america was more valued a degree by my region.

The last basic category is usually volume of immigration which I can relate to the of inexpensive transportation and other advantages associated with globalization and advances in technology, various recent immigrants are not forced to sever connections with the households they leave behind. People consider the advantages and drawbacks of staying vs moving, along with factors just like distance, travel and leisure costs, travelling time, methods of travel, terrain, and cultural barriers before going. For example , the amount of migrant workers that comes from Mexico every day to generate money as well as to achieve a better standard of leaving. That they still provide for their families in Mexico but they believed doing work in the U. S. is far more effective, much easier, and develop way more profit a short period of time.

To summarize, I agree with Mr. Ravenstein “laws of migration” because I can connect his philosophy to present world but still see the same reasoning. Barrica, Argentina and Mexico certainly are a clear example of his immigration point of view.

1

Tweet