Ophelia redetermining gender and insanity of
Past authorities have considered Ophelia an insignificant and marginal persona in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, operating only to additional define Hamlet. One such essenti, Jacques Lacan, interprets Ophelia as a pure object of Hamlet’s sexual interest: she is essential only because she actually is inextricably associated with Hamlet. Fictional criticism denies Ophelia a tale and reason for her individual and instead, her character remains to be entirely dependent upon Hamlet. Hamlet’s suffering and madness regularly takes front stage whilst Ophelia’s madness and loss of life are linked merely to the weakness and frailty of her sex. Feminist authorities since then have got responded to Lacan and other man critics and attempted to “tell” Ophelia’s tale, independent by Hamlet as well as the male point of view, but what is Ophelia’s tale, and does she even have a single? As one feminist critic, Lee Edwards admits, “We can imagine Hamlet’s story without Ophelia, but Ophelia literally does not have any story without Hamlet” (36). One could believe Shakespeare’s personal masculinity afflicted his buildings of the feminine and that the existence of girl characters in his plays provide solely to boost stereotypes and further define the male characters, or, even if Shakespeare was able to transcend the patriarchal ideology of his personal time, that male-dominated critique has enforced these constructions onto Shakespeare’s female heroes. Whatever the case may be, I differ with Edwards’s claim that Ophelia does not have a story independent and distinct from Hamlet. Through this paper I actually aim to reduce these gender-biased depictions from the feminine in order that I may restore Ophelia’s oppressed identity within the patriarchal composition of early on modern society and reevaluate the significance of her character inside the play.
I am taking a feminist approach to my paper mainly because I am interested in examining feminist themes such as lovemaking objectification, sexuality roles and inequality, and oppression in patriarchal culture. This approach lets me examine women’s role and experience in society. We am worried about the portrayal of the female condition in Hamlet, as well as the development of craziness as a gendered construct and just how this cultural stigma presents yet another method of defining male or female roles. Furthermore, within this way I hope to check out how the existence and pervasion of spectacle in noble society pushed, and I even would argue required, the persons therein to fulfill appropriate male or female roles and behave according to social norms, as within the interpersonal hierarchy individuals at the top arranged the standard throughout society and thereby managed social purchase and normalcy. A feminist reading of Shakespeare’s textual content illuminates Ophelia’s character and the distinctly gendered nature of her craziness and loss of life. Through this method I hope to redefine Ophelia’s character and her relevance not only in the play, but also as representative of the oppression of aristocratic women in early their particular more generally.
II. The Sexuality of Craziness
In this section I target particularly about what might be called figurative madness. From the literal impression of the expression, figurative madness has the potential to take on various representational, representational, and metaphorical meanings. Inside the political, patriarchal, and royal society through which Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes place, craziness serves as a metaphor for sedition plus the subversion of authority and dominant ideologies (Salkeld) (Coddon). This takes on out because political goal in men and unruly women who transcended the bounds of their male or female role.
When Ophelia is first released as angry in action 4 picture 5, she is constantly called distracted or divided. Inside the very beginning of the take action, the Guy remarks towards the Queen with reference to Ophelia that, “She is usually importunate, certainly distract” (4. 5. 2). The stage directions after that inform the group, “Enter Ophelia [distracted, with her hair down, playing on a lute]” (4. 5). Shortly thereafter, the King comments upon Ophelia’s departure, “poor Ophelia as well as Divided by herself and her reasonable judgment” (4. 5. 83-4). Distracted is described as “drawn separate, divided” or “mentally drawn to different things, perplexed or confused simply by conflicting interests” (OED). William shakespeare uses this term specifically for define the sort of chaos affecting Ophelia. Her madness represents the division and conflict among her inner, private symbole and the patriarchal ideology in the external culture being forced upon her.
Within this patriarchal and hierarchical society, the king dished up as a microcosm for the entire empire: this microcosm was displayed predominantly throughout the analogy with the body. Levinus Leminius describes this example in his The Touchstone of Complexions: “All the member of the body be so linked and made together, and so on participation and consent can be betweene these people, that if some of the smallest joyntes, or the tiny toe bee hurt or pained, the whole body is distempered and away of quiet” (Salkeld 81). All the members of contemporary society comprised some part of the king’s body and contributed to the healthy condition of the empire. Mad or perhaps seditious persons threatened the fitness of the kingdom and had to be controlled or expurgated. In Hamlet, Rosencrantz gives another example of the full as microcosm:
It is a massy wheel
Fix’d on the summit of the greatest mount
To whose [huge] spokes 10 thousand reduced things
Are mortis’d and adjoin’d, which when it declines
Each little annexment, small consequence
Attends the boist’rous [ruin]. Never by itself
Did the King heave a sigh, but [with] a general moan (3. 3. 17-22).
Similar to the idea of the body as well as parts, the king is likened into a wheel as well as spokes. Within this passage is situated the idea that the interests of the monarch are synonymous with the interests from the entire kingdom, because each of the lesser sociable beings will be completely dependent upon him. These analogies, combined with notion of Divine Proper, support the idea that the tone of voice of expert naturally takes on the tone of voice of great reason and sanity. While Duncan Salkeld states in Madness and Drama in the Age of William shakespeare, “the king’s body specific social associations and legitimated the hierarchy of level that stratified those relations” (57). Quite simply, the king’s body founded specific sociable relations and prescribed matching identities to many of these, since the inventor of these social identities was the supreme voice of specialist and reason, then anybody attempting to transcend or interrupt this order would be perceived as mad or distracted. As a result, madness was perceived as a threat for the Crown and signaled the “failures of sovereignty and reason” (Salkeld2).
The representation of Ophelia as distracted or perhaps divided in Shakespeare’s Hamlet demonstrates the distinctly gendered nature of madness. Through madness Ophelia confronts her anxieties regarding identity in a patriarchal globe and claims her difference and competitors to guy power. Her perplexity and confusion control from the turmoil emerging coming from her dual identity: the main one forced upon her by society as well as the other appearing from her own person. Ophelia’s oppressed identity temporarily finds the way to the surface when ever her fan goes angry and is deported, her brother departs to a different country, and her daddy is killed. The men nearest to her who have been constantly shaping her identity have abandoned her and then for once she’s thinking for their self and discovering her own identity.
Carol Neely explores this concept further in Distracted Topics: Madness and Gender in Shakespeare and Early Contemporary Culture. The girl argues that madness was not a static concept but was evolving and undergoing widespread change through the early modern period: the theater served as a catalyst in spurring on this transform. The public stage served to show audiences how to identify chaos and separate different types of chaos. Madness had been portrayed in new ways, creating new subcategories of diverted conditions including lovesickness and melancholy, which in turn took upon changed male or female associations. Neely states, “The gendered restrictions of the high-end human subject were being redefined through their dislocations and excesses” (2). Men had been believed to be ruled by their intelligence and logical thought, when women, it was assumed, had been led only by their passions. Moreover, the madness of men was associated with intellectual and innovative genius, even though the madness of ladies was viewed as biological and emotional.
These gender constructs will be demonstrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet through the contrasting representations of madness in the characters of Hamlet and Ophelia. Hamlet’s madness is definitely characterized mostly by his overactive intellect, as shown by his witty puns. Polonius observes through a non-public conversation with him, “Though this become madness, yet there is technique in’t” (2. 2 . 203-4), and Guildenstern describes how Hamlet uses “crafty madness” to avoid Guildenstern and Rosencrantz’s attempts to identify the reason for his inepte behavior. Moreover, Hamlet’s madness is not really seen as neurological and all-natural, but as a thing that transcends biology. His chaos is more of the strategy, instead of an involuntary disorder. Hamlet warns Horatio and Marcellus at the beginning of the play that he might “put an antic disposition on” (1. your five. 172). This kind of phrase suggests that Hamlet will certainly act or perhaps represent himself as a madman to obtain his revenge. In comparison, Ophelia’s madness is based simply on more than emotion. Instead of witty puns, Ophelia noises her craziness through music (playing for the lute) and song. Furthermore, nothing implies that Ophelia is “acting” mad, but instead her madness is portrayed while natural, or perhaps part of her nature. Ophelia’s constant relationship with plants, first because she distributes flowers towards the members of the court during her craziness, and then because the Princess or queen gives a free account of Ophelia’s death, connects Ophelia and her express with femininity and character. Therefore , the representations of madness in Ophelia and Hamlet are clearly and distinctly gendered.
III. Court Life and the Oppression of Women
The presence and significance of spectacle in royal world pressured persons therein to satisfy appropriate gender roles and behave in respect to cultural norms. I actually am enthusiastic about how spectacle was used simply by aristocratic society to maintain control of the lower classes and how this may have had further more implications impacting the upper-class as well. In case the masses were conditioned to find out visually through spectacle, in that case court culture inherits the ponderous responsibility of presenting and with correct and traditional cultural behavior including restraint via premarital love-making, murder, plus the transcendence of typical sexuality roles. In Louis Montrose’s book, The objective of Playing, he emphasizes the dual nature of subjectivity: “on the main one hand, it shapes people as loci of awareness and, alternatively, it positions, motivates, and constrains them within”it subjects them to”social networks and cultural unique codes that in the end exceed their very own comprehension or perhaps control” (16).
Due to the social hierarchical order that was established in early modern society, specific behavior, dress, and other external and obvious attributions had been expected among the upper classes. External performances and displays of vision were essential for the aristocracy to maintain their position as being a ruling category. Especially within a time once social freedom was becoming more common, the top classes especially had to further more redefine category boundaries to keep up separation and distinction.
The objectives for behavior and execute in early modern society were decisively gendered. Carry out literature throughout the Renaissance set up certain rules for the private and non-private behavior of women and discussed ideal female virtues, such as chastity, behavior, humility, and silence. Dads and partners were accountable for teaching and enforcing this kind of prescriptive role for women. Whenever we first see Ophelia in the play the girl with being encouraged by first her brother, Laertes and then her father, Polonius regarding Hamlet’s affection toward her. This scene demonstrates the function of males in educating young women how to carry out themselves in society, including the importance of preserving their advantage.
Polonius: Do you believe his tenders, as you call them?
Ophelia: I do not know, my lord, the things i should believe.
Polonius: Marry, Let me teach you (1. 3. 103-05)
Ophelia is lacking in reason and rational services that would allow her to believe for himself, instead, the girl with portrayed as being a blank slate where the males in her life may write the stipulations of her identity. To any or all this, of course , Ophelia passively displays her obedience, “I shall obey, my lord” (1. 5. 136). The social vices placed on girls created a differentiation between what women were asked or expected to end up being, and what women actually were. This discrepancy is usually voiced simply by Ophelia during her chaos when the girl tells the King, “Lord, we know what we should are, although know not really what we may be” (4. 5. 43-4). Although this statement discloses Ophelia as a woman competent of realizing the male or female role pushed upon her, some females internalized the dominant ideology of their traditions so that the external identity imposed on them started to be synonymous with their internal one. Men with this time stated that they may distinguish good women from bad by simply outward signs alone. For instance , a women who was full of words and phrases, loud, strong, impudent, shameless, and wore make-up was considered a harlot, while a woman who maintained her true appearance and was temperate in her head, silence in her tongue, and bashfulness in her countenance was deemed a fantastic woman (Aughterson 96). The value of facing outward show was key to the identity of any woman. In act several scene 1 Polonius instructs Ophelia tips on how to act inside the presence of Hamlet:
Ophelia, walk you right here. “Gracious, so please you
We all will bestow ourselves. [To Ophelia. ] Read on this guide
That tv show of such an physical exercise may color
Your [loneliness]. We are oft at fault in this”
‘Tis too much prov’d”that with devotion’s illustration
And pious action we do glucose o’er
Satan himself (3. 1 . 43-8).
Spiritual piety was also a valued quality in a woman, nevertheless , as this situation demonstrates, the outward portrayal of these kinds of piety was much more crucial than authentic, internal loyalty. The two most important things to note about this passage are Polonius’s use of the imperative and the references to affectation. Polonius’s most comfortable means of addressing his daughter is imperative speech””walk you below, ” “Read on this book””either commanding or advising his daughter to act a certain method. Polonius’s presentation is also permeated by afflicted diction, just like “show, inches “color, inch “visage, inches and “sugar o’er. ” This incredibly clearly shows that he is not really concerned with the main goodness and beauty of his girl, as the outward rendering of their self.
Although the importance of conduct and tendencies pervaded contemporary society at all levels, it was specifically crucial for females of the uppr classes. The social framework of “the nation was regulated simply by obedience into a hierarchy of superiors leading up to the King”: this included an internal hierarchy in the home where the ladies and children obeyed the man of the home (Stone 21). The unique stratification of varying locations of men was important in maintaining interpersonal order, and external manifestation and outward spectacle, such as manners, clothing, and extravagant recreation were crucial in distinguishing among classes. Aristocratic contemporary society was required to spend greatly to keep up a lifestyle which the world expected of them. Within a world based on vision and self-fashioning, an individual’s exterior appearance and possessions became crucial toward maintaining an increased order in society.
Spectacle pervaded aristocratic early on modern lifestyle and utilized not only to screen and possess their prosperity, but as well to maintain social order and authority within the lower classes. Queen At the is one of the most popular implementors of spectacle. The girl believed in publicizing herself by simply touring the country to show very little to her supportive subjects and to sample all their hospitality. Elizabeth would adorn herself in extravagant clothes and abundant jewels and go on summer time “progresses, ” which were ceremonial journeys or perhaps pageants through her property. On these kinds of parades noble hosted her at all their homes and flattered her with pricey pleasures and gifts. These types of occasional progresses were incredibly detrimental to the nobles moving into the area, since the cost of amusing the Princess or queen caused a large number of to go insolvent. In addition with her spectacular pageants, her the courtroom at home required on theatrical elements, where the “court moved in an atmosphere of romance, with music, dancing, performs, and the elaborate, fancy-dress entertainments called masques” (Greenblatt, “General” 20). Elizabeth, who was at first deemed not enough to regulation because of her gender, could gain expert over her court and the country through this theatrical construct, which usually came to be referred to as the “cult of love. ” The French legate during the time of her reign was said to include remarked regarding her, “She is a Little princess who can act any part she pleases” (Greenblatt, “General” 21). Elizabeth required her subjects to deal with her with love poems, and she would likewise act in response in such a manner1. Additionally , because of the enormous amount of pressure on her to marry and secure a great heir, the girl feigned interest in a number of household and overseas suitors without any genuine desire to marry. In this way, Elizabeth employed spectacle to achieve authority more than her the courtroom and nation.
When spectacle became a tool pertaining to aristocrats to gain authority, it also had returning effects. Catherine Bates notes that from the fifteenth century, “the court became a self-conscious model intended for the exercise”social, bureaucratic, and public”of regal hegemony” and this because it was “Perceived being a centre of political and cultural activity, the court docket became a spotlight of scrutiny” (9). Since the upper-class was associated with stage show and thus usually “on level, ” or perhaps in the spotlight so to speak, to get the people to view and see, it became an essential responsibility so they can embody appropriate and ideal social habit. Such strict stipulations would confine sex relations, violent acts, gender roles, and other such wrong and unconventional behavior that might incite the masses to abandon cultural order. Stephen Greenblatt in the Renaissance Self-Fashioning: More to Shakespeare, focuses on the “politically-appointed self-fashioning of elite who dramatize in their infinite number of public exhibits those fabricated means by which usually power seeks to contain and control the often unruly body of the condition. ” Though this system was for the most part good, the extreme importance that the lifestyle placed on these kinds of self-fashioning specified and limited the types of selfhood available to an individual inside it, and then for women whose identity at all levels of the interpersonal ladder was confined, this effect was particularly stifling.
Throughout the first section of the play, Ophelia’s presence on stage is marginal and passive. Her speaking parts will be few and far between, and the only action she partakes in is wholly altered and predetermined by the men characters. Only in the second half of the play, through her madness and death, does Ophelia take control of her individual “story” and act on their own from the guys in her life. Ophelia’s presence rules act four scene 5 and offers a striking distinction from her passive and obsequious position in previous scenes. In this scene, Ophelia barely enables the various other characters from the court have a word in, repeatedly trimming them off with, “Nay, pray you mark. inch The Ruler attempts to redirect her toward her appropriate male or female role with his various addresses and answers: “Pretty Ophelia! ” (4. 5. 56) and “Conceit upon her father” (4. 5. 45). His reaction to Ophelia’s madness illustrates the forces of patriarchal ideology on women. He focuses on certain areas of the female identity, such as natural beauty or a nice outward appearance, plus the tendency of females to be fanciful or perhaps moody. However , Ophelia adamantly resists and transcends these boundaries. Ophelia, who has recently been conditioned to abide by and continue to be silent, right now finds a voice through her “madness. ” For the first time, Ophelia requires command of the world around her and communicates herself freely and without restraining.
Although the members from the court deem her crazy, it is clear through a close reading that underlying the shroud of song, Ophelia’s dialogue includes truths regarding the present situation. In her first broken of lyricism, Ophelia exposes the Queen’s lack of faithfulness and her fickleness in love: “How should I the true-love understand / By another one? inch (4. a few. 23-4) Although the intended that means underlying Ophelia’s songs will certainly forever remain obscure and equivocal, the simple fact that Ophelia formally details her song to the Full suggests that that applies specifically for her person, and in this case a subject of extreme guilt and shame to get the Princess or queen. Next, as the California king is coming into the field Ophelia sings, “Larded every with nice flowers, as well as Which bewept to the ground did not proceed / With true-love showers” (4. your five. 38-40). Through this passage, Ophelia could very well be alluding to the infamous deaths and burials of both her father plus the late Ruler Hamlet. Polonius’s murder was covered up and his death remained widely obscure whilst his burial hastily performed. Likewise, Ruler Hamlet was buried with out “true-love baths, ” indicating the lack of mourning from his wife following his loss of life. In the two cases, the boys do not obtain the formal, honorable burial wedding ceremony that they ought to have because of the Full and Princess or queen. Lastly, Ophelia’s songs stimulate sexual styles. Her last song suggests the nature of her personal romantic relationship with Hamlet. She sings, “Quoth the lady, ‘Before you tumbled myself, / You promis’d me personally to get married. ‘ / (He answers. ) ‘So would I actually ‘a’ done by yonder sun, / And thou hadst not come to my own bed'” (4. 5. 62-6). The sex innuendoes characterizing Hamlet’s speech toward Ophelia earlier in the play, his abrupt conversation advising her to go to a nunnery and claiming that he never loved her, and Ophelia’s obsequious and passive location as a female of lower quality than Hamlet, almost all inform the assumption that Ophelia provides partaken in premarital sexual intercourse with Hamlet. Through Ophelia’s seemingly “mad” demonstrations of song, your woman expresses the numerous corruptions in the royal court docket.
Throughout the play the King demonstrates anxiety concerning Hamlet’s craziness and hires Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to deport him to Great britain stating, “I like him not, neither stands this safe with us / To let his craziness range” (3. 3. 1-2). Ultimately, he plots with Laertes to kill Hamlet with poison. Similarly, the Queen is usually plagued with guilt with regards to her earlier actions and attempts to silence Ophelia. The Queen’s account of Ophelia’s loss of life at the end of act a few scene you is exceptional for its vocabulary as well as their comprehensiveness. The language itself endeavors to place Ophelia in the timeless state in the constructed girly identity. The Queen sets the level with imagery of nature, describing the willow woods and its “hoary leaves, inch “the glassy stream, inches and the “fantastic garlands” that Ophelia makes from types of flowers. Your woman then points out how Ophelia “Fell inside the weeping brook… like a animal native and indued as well as Unto that element” (5. 1 . 166-182). This stream is some nature, but it really is also personified as weeping. Laertes, immediately following this explanation, comments for the femininity of crying: “It is our trick, Mother nature her custom made holds, as well as Let pity say what will, when these are removed, / The lady will be out” (5. 1 ) 187-9). In this way, the Queen attempts to make a picture that may be beautiful and natural: the image of women that was anticipated by early modern sexuality stereotypes. Ruben Everett Millais’s Ophelia adequately captures the Queen’s consideration of Ophelia’s death. He represents her death since beautiful and natural, with her decorative dress spread out in the water and the organic scenery encircling her. Millais’s portrait further serves to objectify the female body and eternalize the representation from the female id, which Ophelia had been planning to escape.
Given the desperate reasons behind the King and Queen to silence the madness of Ophelia and Hamlet, it will be easy to translate this off-stage death like a murder, rather than suicide. The Queen is the only see to Ophelia’s death, and her account of it is indeed detailed and comprehensive the fact that reader can only be suspicious about the her claim that Ophelia fully commited suicide. This kind of possibility also provides a motive as to why the Queen would try to influence her market that Ophelia’s death was completely all-natural. In this way, the authoritative, royal figures of Hamlet utilize cultural judgment of craziness to confine, stop, and dismiss Ophelia and her unruly behavior.
Considering Ophelia’s oppressed point out within noble, patriarchal world, it is just as possible that the girl did block herself within an act of suicide. In Hamlet’s popular soliloquy in act three or more scene one particular, “To end up being, or to not be, ” he claims that his anxiety about the afterlife and the unfamiliar prevents him from currently taking his individual life. Because of this conversation, Ophelia’s action becomes fearless and brave because the girl with able to do something that Hamlet is too cowardly to do. Ophelia intrepidly confronts the unidentified to escape her temporal enduring and oppression. Regardless of whether Ophelia was murdered in an attempt to liberate herself and speak out against the file corruption error of the court docket, or courageously confronted loss of life by her own hand to escape her worldly oppression, Ophelia protect a significant and independent position in Shakespeare’s Hamlet and assumes a good of heroism in the perform.
Even though this daily news has stated to tell Ophelia’s story throughout the contexts of madness and spectacle at the begining of modern lifestyle, this is still only an inchoate portrait. As Elaine Showalter says in Symbolizing Ophelia: Women, Madness, plus the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism, “There is no ‘true’ Ophelia to get whom feminist criticism need to unambiguously speak, but perhaps only a Cubist Ophelia of multiple perspectives, more than sum of most her parts” (238). If this is the case, in that case various gaps in Ophelia’s story remain to be discovered and told. This daily news has taken a general way toward the oppression of aristocratic ladies in early modern society, looking at the courtroom society all together and the sexuality roles founded therein. Yet , further analysis investigating certain case research of aristocratic women, specifically women in case of similar to Ophelia who are generally not necessary aristocratic themselves although who live among court docket society, would be particularly useful in understanding Ophelia’s character. Just as Karin Coddon uses the historical determine, Robert Devereux, the second earl of Essex to skin out Hamlet’s character in “Suche Odd Desygns”: Chaos, Subjectivity, and Treason in Hamlet and Elizabethan Traditions, a seite an seite between Ophelia and a historical woman living in the courtroom society who experiences comparable oppression and madness would greatly progress scholarship toward a more exact and well-rounded depiction of Ophelia’s personality. I have simply been able to skim the top of history of tips involving madness and the progression of it as a gendered construct and the associated with spectacle on early their particular. The idea of the aristocratic society of spectacle in particular as well as its role in the oppression of aristocratic females is a subset of scholarship which could be even more expanded. I use attempted to flesh out Ophelia’s character in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, and to believe her figure is not really insignificant and marginal, or completely influenced by Hamlet. Rather, I hope i have revealed, that Ophelia does have a story of her own, and that the implications of her madness are just while significant as Hamlet’s.
Aughterson, Kate. Renaissance Girl: Constructions of Femininity in England 1520-1680 (Constructions of Femininity in England). New York: Routledge, 1995. Print.
Bates, Catherine. The Rhetoric of Courtship in Elizabethan Language and Literary works. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. Print.
Coddon, Karin S. “‘Suche Strange Desygns’: Madness, Subjectivity, and Treason in Hamlet and Elizabethan Culture. Hamlet (Case Studies in Modern Criticism). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 1994. 380-402. Print.
Edwards, Shelter. The Labors of Mind: Toward a Theory of Female Heroism. Critical Request 6. one particular (1979): 33-49. Print.
Greenblatt, Sophie. General Advantages. The Norton Shakespeare. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton Company, Inc., 08. 1-78. Produce.
Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: Even more to Shakespeare. Chicago: College or university of Chi town, 1980. Print out.
Montrose, Louis A. The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural National politics of the Elizabethan Theatre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Print out.
Montrose, Louis Adrian. The Subject of At the: Authority, Male or female, and Manifestation. Chicago: School of Chi town, 2006. Print out.
Neely, Carol Jones. Distracted Subject matter: Madness and Gender in Shakespeare and Early Modern day Culture. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2004. Produce.
Salkeld, Duncan. Craziness and Episode in the Regarding Shakespeare. Manchester, UK: Gatwick UP, Given away exclusively in the united states and Canada by St Martins, 93. Print.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet (Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 1993. Print.
Showalter, Elaine. Representing Ophelia: Women, Chaos, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism. Hamlet (Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 1994. 220-40. Produce.
Natural stone, Lawrence. The Crisis from the Aristocracy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1965. Produce.