The person centred and psychodynamic models of

Paper type: Health and fitness,

Words: 1301 | Published: 04.14.20 | Views: 575 | Download now

Part A

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Compare how the person-centred and psychodynamic models of counselling understand the person, and how both of these approaches explain psychological relax experienced by simply individuals. (1250 words) Inside society today, there is a substantial range of theoretical approaches employed by Psychotherapists and counsellors. The aim of this conversation is to compare two of these approaches, the person-centred as well as the psychodynamic types of counselling, specifically how these types of theories understand the individuals and psychological problems. In order to appreciate psychodynamic remedy, it is very important to consider the work of Sigmund Freud and the progress Psychoanalytical theory.

During every his lifestyle, Freud attemptedto unravel your mind creating methodical devices to discover answers relating to the unconscious and its particular impulses. He ignored regular science and believed in free of charge association (patients talking what comes to mind). Among most of his assumptions was the opinion that all behavior has a cause, and all repressed feelings and thoughts of early years as a child are banned to the subconscious mind, for that reason leading to future problems in adulthood, as the patient is usually unaware of accurate meaning of these past encounters.

With this type of therapy, the analyst seeks to interpret and convey a repressed feeling in a more acceptable and sensitive way and it can become a very extended and rigorous process.

It is vital to recognize that Freud’s theories will be the result of a specific historical some culture. Furthermore it should be noted that the Psychodynamic strategy is a broad perspective and has been applied successfully throughout time and has been backed up simply by large number of pros and considerable literature. Freud’s methods have already been continually adapted and modified throughout time and through the job of many powerfulk psychoanalytical pros such as Adler (1927), Jung (1964), Klein (1926) and Erikson (1950). From their work, the Psychodynamic model of counselling was developed as well as its main features were much like Freud’s psychoanalysis, such as the need for the subconscious mind along with previous experiences in shaping current behaviour. This theory also suggests that the personality is composed of three parts: the Id, consisting of the primitive sex and hostile impulses; the ego which can be the mindful mind and represents everything that is usually under our awareness; and the super-ego, which handles the Id and represents the moral suggestions. Many professionals in the psychodynamic tradition think that psychological stress results from internal conflicts that are not well discussed by the security mechanism.

Within words, the defense device usually gives us with ways to relieve these issues leading to a fulfilment of both the superego and the IDENTITY. Some individuals protection mechanism, yet , fails or perhaps is unable to start, often resulting in ill-adjusted behaviour. Moreover, the Psychodynamic model highlights the dynamics between your patient and therapist and even more importantly the transference that develops in this process, and also in the interpretations of the patient’s desire and fantasies. This approach uses counselling as a vehicle to get interpretation, where the client is usually stimulated to speak about childhood and relationship with parents, between many other past experiences ultimately causing the knowing of the true triggers or urges surrounding her/his actions in adult lifestyle. The process of transference above mentioned would occur if the patient converses with the specialist, projecting on the latter feelings experienced in previous human relationships, being that these types of feelings will be significantly motivated by the patient’s unconscious head. This process can frequently provide a quite effective solution to assessing and dealing with emotional relax in persons.

In the 1950s a far more Humanistic strategy developed by Carl Rogers shot to popularity in the USA. The Person-Centred Therapy or Rogerian Approach emphasised personal growth and assumed that the procedure for analysis ought to be easy to understand, warm and enthusiastic towards the specific. Contrary to the hierarchic relationship between therapist and patient encountered in psychodynamic therapy, the person-centred procedure classifies both the individual and therapists while equal companions, referring to individuals in therapy as consumers instead. This kind of empowerment gives the clients the independency and control intended for improvement of their lives. One more crucial big difference between the Rogerian approach and Psychodynamics is definitely Rogers’s elimination of all model around remedy. Rogers thought that despite the symptoms alighting from past experiences, it would be much more ideal for the client to pay attention to the present and future as opposed to the past. However are only some established associated with the Person-centred approach, it is vital to note the emphasis is put around the healing relationship, aiming on the individuals ability to achieve a perfectunderstanding on the planet themselves. By emphasising within this ability, the therapist could lead the consumer to reduce conflicts between the great self and present do it yourself, significantly raising the person’s self-worth. This kind of therapy works depending on encouraging the consumer, to focus on their very own ability to achieve self-knowledge instead of basing his interpretations on the client’s subconscious motives, because psychodynamic traditionalists would.

The techniques found in the Person-Centred approach possess some basic principles such as congruence (letting clients to have themselves because they are); great rapport (maintaining a positive frame of mind towards the client) and sympathy (capacity to understand the customers’ feelings). Though both theories differ in approach, there are some similarities in beliefs that help to form the person’s behaviour. In addition to the psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, Rogers believed which the therapeutic romantic relationship could lead to a much better understanding of the clients’ behavior and perhaps will also lead to a sense of improvement. In addition , the two theories agree that simply by verbalising stress (‘the chatting cure’) people would experience relieved and would then be more fruitful and live a more rewarding life than they would in any other case have had. In conclusion, the main notion of both types is strongly based on how the individual’s clashes and relax are tackled. While Freud focused on interpretations of what he thought were the unconscious issues to a patient’s suffering, Rogers believed the therapist will need to encourage totally free expression and problem image resolution in a nondirective way.

The perspective of the client/patient in every single theoretical approach would fluctuate in the way each theory identifies the cause of mental illness, or mal-adjusted conduct. Moreover, inside the Person-Centred approach, the specialist operates by some basic concepts such as congruence, positive relationship, and accord towards the customer while in Psychodynamics the therapy operates based on the basic principle of transference between sufferer and specialist and the model of dreams and dreams. The specialist would disclose little about himself inside the psychodynamic custom, but in the Rogerian way, therapists might show more credibility and uncover more of their personality. Rogerians advocate the fact that client would be better helped if urged to look at their very own existing problem rather than a great unconscious reason or somebody else’s analysis. The individual would be in the middle of remedy and could begiven total control of what you should talk about. Each approach features its strengths and weaknesses and one particular size does not fit every. People should take into account the severity, length and interesting depth of their cases in order to achieve a psychological alter and satisfy their potential.

Part B


McLeod, J. (2008) ‘Themes and concerns in the psychodynamic approach to counselling’ in L. McLeod, M. Hill (Eds. ), Introduction to Counselling (3nd ed. )Milton Keynes: The Open School. McLeod, T. (2008) ‘Theory and practice of the person-centred approach’ in J. McLeod, M. Hill (Eds. ), Introduction to Guidance (3nd male impotence. )Milton Keynes: The Wide open University.


Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!

Get My Essay