Viking Investments Learning Journal Essay

The Viking settlement was quite tasking or in other words that it was tough to try to find out a solution mainly because both sides had been in a bad situation monetarily, and the volume of options to solve the problem were limited. From the beginning all of us just mentioned the scenario in a open up, friendly way to see what each side were required to say about the situation. We reviewed each trouble at hand and what either side wanted, therefore we had several idea of what type of solution we could try to come up with.

When we found out the fact that things we all wanted would not be able to yield a pleasant option for any get together. I knew at this time someone would have to compromise within a big way to come up with a plausible remedy. The Viking Investments ruse presented an actuality of many discussions about money owed: It is beneficial for both sides to come to an agreement and steer clear of any legal situations. In this instance, Pat(Harsha) and Sandy (me) had a contractual agreement to get materials and services delivered, however through miscommunication a great upgrade was performed on the materials with no Pat’s personal approval.

For this settlement to be successful, Pat and I had to get past the petty quarrels of whom screwed up and who is legally accountable for the events leading up to this negotiation. If we ongoing debating the merits of just one another’s positions, we would possess ended up in court, I would have reported bankrupt and Pat might have ended up receiving a much lower percentage of the payable amount. Thankfully, both sides realized this and the negotiation proceeded to go smoothly.

I knew we would job something out when we equally decided to come together. Both Terry and I centered on the numbers of the contract, and how we could work/pay away Sandy’s financial debt, while nonetheless allowing WoodCrafters to flourish, and Viking Investment to carry on its future growth goals. We all did find a great arrangement that might allow for these kinds of goals to get feasible.

In the beginning, Pat held pushing to sell my personal mansion and use the takings to help with my financial situation but My spouse and i pushed against it since I regarded as it my own absolute worst case scenario. We opted for accept payment that would change WoodCrafters simply no profit to get work rendered, and allow pertaining to future function to be done as a means of paying off the $200, 500 outstanding personal debt. Furthermore, we all agreed that Pat could write-off the rent due for 15, 000 and later pay an overall total of 810, 000 (490, 000 cash and two condos with market value of 160, 500 each). The negotiation approach I employed in dealing with Dab was to emphasize the bad impact certainly not coming to a contract would have in our firms.

I continually explained to him that not arriving at an agreement will find my own company proclaiming bankruptcy and for that reason limiting the returns paid to Viking. This approach appeared to work as Dab realized that was true and was extremely wanting of the agreement that will not leave WoodCrafters in bankruptcy. My spouse and i also emphasized the importance of putting whatever arguments there were in the past aside for the purposes of coming to a great arrangement. I used to be very pleased with the negotiation as we created a package that appeared to work for both sides and allow both companies to keep their popularity and enable long term growth.

It was a dispute- based settlement as each of our BATNA’s were linked. This helped to ascertain a position of strength make up the get go. We first discovered this via watching attacks of 35 Rock wherever Jack Donaghy was linked to various negotiations. Jack was a very strong personality and always supported coming from a place of strength although it sometimes meant digging up a little dirt on the adversary.

I knew My spouse and i wasn’t heading that significantly in this discussion but it still helped to achieve the idea in the back of my mind. Despite the fact that I knew I had very little power over Pat, I tried to emphasize the huge benefits I had. For example , I kept talking about the simple fact that he gave his secretary the justification to handle thing while having been away and that if we went to court it might hold-up as a sworn accounts.

I likewise kept reminding him that if we didn’t reach a he was the risk of individual bankruptcy and that was something i was both looking to avoid. I do believe that helped. So I might say that creating and emphasizing your strengths, no matter how very little, really helps in negotiations. I discovered that it likewise helped to work with mixed communications with my own partner.

Although I attempted to establish a placement of strength, I as well made it crystal clear that I was very willing to come to a favorable agreement for each party so I basically reciprocated contentious communication using a cooperative communication and this helped a lot. I would personally love to work out with Harsha again. Having been intelligent, ready to come up with a very good solution, and honest regarding his requirements.

This discussion showed the value of discovering the bigger picture. You need to know what quarrelling and not getting an agreement means to you, your company, and your upcoming. Although the time has been the time hath been a restriction, I do believe our agreement process was done effectively.

If I got this situation again, I would discuss more and operate the numbers more to generate more concepts about how to reach a happy compliance. I think I acquired a pretty quite a bit at the end. Discussing with Pat was a pleasure and I’d definitely do it again. While having been very objective on receiving some of his interests accomplished, which at times led to malfunction of communication, he comprehended that the just way to avoid going to court would be to use a collaborative strategy.

He was because concerned with my personal interests as he was along with his own that we appreciated significantly. I learned that even when persons make big mistakes in the business world nobody wins the moment two get-togethers have to go to court except for lawyers. Although Pat thought that what I do was totally ridiculous, he made sure that we came to a great amicable agreement. I will likewise take away the fact that only way to really satisfy the interests of both parties will be collaborative. My spouse and i also learned a lot regarding entitlement with this negotiation.

My spouse and i learned that in many cases in a settlement, entitlement or perhaps feelings of entitlement imply absolutely nothing. Even though Pat believed that having been entitled to more than he received, if he focused on that entitlement I might have received absolutely nothing. Even if he also felt that paying of the 250, 500 extra pertaining to the maple wasn’t his problem and that I payable him 210, 000, he also understood that he previously something to shed if we didn’t come to an agreement and so he quickly forgot regarding those facts and concentrated more about problem solving and us helping each other away.

Next time Let me disclose almost all relevant data sooner. Through this negotiation I didn’t inform Pat that selling my residence was a possibility upfront because I felt as though we have house was a last resort. However , the only way to come to a agreed agreement in this instance was to offer my house. Hence the negotiation might have been accomplished in a more timely vogue had I actually disclosed this information up front.

Overall I do think this settlement was a good representation of real world concerns. I certainly don’t wish to be in this kind situation in the foreseeable future, but it really was good practice and it definitely sharpened my settlement skills even more. I think this was a good manifestation of the type of items people proceed through in life and the people that you will possibly be working together with.

Overall my personal big eliminate from this workout is Do certainly not breach a contract.

Tweet