Who was rodriguez as a creative writer personality
Rich Rodriguez tries to write about learning to write in zero unclear terms in his life Hunger of Memory. Rodriguez constantly fluctuates between two extremes: the worry and hate of producing due to its incredibly personal mother nature and the perception that writing is the most public form of expression. As he attempts to deal with his enormous uncertainness regarding his ideals of personal and community, he attempts to do this through the lense of the writer. Rodriguez discusses the influence of his romantic Spanish-speaking house life on his literarily development through the process of his education. A constant juxtaposition of literature, home life, and his identification as a copy writer serve as pieces in a dilemna that Rodriguez tries anxiously to put together. Although Rodriguez tries desperately to go over his personal and public existence through the lense of his education, in the end his base ambiguity regarding his simplest identity being a writer prevents a successfully clear description of the pieces of his life.
Rodriguez constantly insists that writing is the most isolated employment opportunity, as he must eloquently divulge what is the majority of personal to him. Rodrigues asserts that he publishes articles “of a single life only”, his very own (6). This individual views producing as not only a deeply non-public ritual of looking at the colorful puzzle pieces of his life and choosing which pieces to write down, but as well as a deeply individual knowledge. His repeating use of metawriting delves deeper into the personal aspect of composing as he regularly discovers more layers of himself fantastic language. Throughout his education, Rodriguez recalls the tendency of “written words” to make him feel “all alone”, like the work of fitting collectively an array of words was a great inescapably involved task (64). Continuing this symbiotic trend of composing and loneliness, Rodriguez begins to find peace of mind in the “exclusive society, segregated from others” of his fellow writers (75). His identity as a writer gives a piece of his life that is certainly very different through the rest and that creates a more interesting and one of a kind picture than any other element of his existence. Even the literal act of writing this individual considers a “lonely journey” (189). The puzzle of his id must be finished without the aid of others when he pieces with each other the broken phrases of his identity- by itself. Rodriguez frequently insists that writing is a really personal action, yet regularly discusses the inherently open public nature of writing.
Just as frequently he examines his reclusive habit of writing, he simultaneously dislikes the innately public characteristics of his work as this individual faces great ambiguity concerning his individual work. A child that struggles to connect his own and open public life, writing “[determines] [his] public identity” (6). Composing provides Rodriguez only with extreme feelings of solitude yet this literally specifies him in public areas. His own autobiography, what should be the the majority of deeply personal work of his existence, and yet this individual feels to him just like “the many public factor [he] provides ever done” (191). When he writes his story, this individual discusses the physical and emotional means of writing, ongoing his usage of metawriting and sometimes metabasis. Incongruously in fact , this individual least worried about himself. This individual believes he is writing to get the “public reader” (191). His discussion of the audience appears to use metawriting to both isolate and connect him self to the outside the house world of his readers. He could be focused on his own indifference while producing yet at the same time is a lot more focused beyond himself, in the audience. Rodriguez seems totally incapable of identifying whether the operate is for him self or for the reader as he describes the process of writing painfully. There is extreme antithesis in how that the crafted word is usually both therefore terrifyingly destitute, the “impersonality of the created word”, yet it is still the medium that Rodriguez uses to communicate his most deeply personal thoughts (205). Only through composing can Rodriguez communicate his “vast community identity”. Simply through long term periods of intense isolation can Rodriguez begin to truly feel understood. The irony that is present in Rodriguez’s contradictory emotions toward composing determines the strategy he uses to speak his life- both open public and personal.
Rodriguez’s very identity being a writer is definitely the definition of double entendre and as this individual writes, this kind of ambiguity concerning the action of writing only even more spreads during all of his discussions. The conflicting feelings of Rodriguez toward what he is many basically -a writer- bring about his overwhelming lack of crystal clear identity, leading to his writing being made of “words like jigsaw pieces” (197). Rodriguez’s words, his language, the particular things that make him an author already irrevocably do not fit together. His metawriting further emphasizes his personal confusion as he can not escape the circle of his identity. Rodriguez “writes” and he is “a writer” (1). Still, he sometimes feels unable to confront the “isolation writing requires” (189). However, Rodriguez continue to finds solace in writing. This kind of piece of him that is still so unpleasant and contrary still offers a place where he “no longer needs to experience alone or perhaps eccentric” (203). He uses his personality as a writer to attempt to dole the “sharp distinction among public and life” (200). Rodriguez efforts to put the puzzle of his id together towards a more coherent way, with fewer jagged jigsaw edges and “distinctions”, yet ultimately simply by putting together his own problem he just further blows the lines. However , this ambiguity in the opinions of his publishing bleed through onto all the other pieces of his identity and only further blur lines and increase overall unconformity.
Words and phrases are the stuff with which Rodriguez attempts to make a beautiful, single picture of his identification. However , as a result of contradictory nature of his sentiments toward writing, simply by writing about composing (metawriting), this individual only further more jumbles and confounds the puzzle components of his currently confounding persona. As Rodriguez desperately endeavors to form a logical identity presented through a coherent autobiography, this individual ultimately just further piteuxs both and leaves his argument inadequate and ambiguous: writing does not create a full puzzle.