Drug Testing Welfare Recipients Essay
Paper type: Govt,
Words: 1287 | Published: 11.25.19 | Views: 309 | Download now
In respect to a analyze on the government of Canada’s website, in 2003, 1 . 7 million people were on government assistance and that number has continued to expand. The current unemployment rate in Canada is 7. 2% and many of those family members rely on the us government to put meals on the table, a roof above their brain and garments on their systems, meaning that funds is absolutely important.
However , doing work citizens are usually resentful from the citizens taking the money that they can earned and several are strenuous that welfare recipients always be drug analyzed in order to be qualified. Although nowhere fast in Canada requires drug assessment to receive well being, several claims in the United States do. However , this idea does not consider that drug assessment recipients punishes children, neglects that medication addiction can be described as disease that demands treatment, and this it has which may not spend less. Therefore , drug testing to be eligible for wellbeing is callous and nothing but a symptom of discrimination and selfishness in society.
Removing money by a citizen that tested great for prescription drugs would illegally punish their children, who happen to be innocent and didn’t choose to have the parents they were created to. seventy eight. 5% of assistance receivers in Ok are kids (Richey), meaning many children could go through immensely because of their parent’s activities. If a person on welfare were to test out positive pertaining to drugs and the funds may be taken away, youngsters would shed their whole source of income, which usually would mean they might suffer much more than that they already do.
The kids delivered to drug addicts would have simply no lunch cash or clothing for college while alcoholics’ children still received cash. This would be really hypocritical in fact it is cruel to disadvantage kids that already have the odds stacked against these people. Living in poverty could cause these to do terribly in school and maybe turn to medications themselves, entirely obliterating any kind of chance they’d for a better future. It is also possible to argue that if mother and father are using prescription drugs, they are previously wasting the bucks that could go towards their children. Although this argument is valid, completely taking away all of the money is not going to resolve the problem.
More over, sending more children into the previously crowded engender care system would also only trigger more problems, a fact that American Public welfare Association, the National Connection of Cultural Workers, plus the National Relationship of Dependency on alcohol and Substance abuse Counselor most agree with because they oppose almost all laws mandating drug testing in order to receive government funding (Richey). Finally, the money that families obtain could help attempting parents get into rehab and back prove feet, allowing for the children to overcome poverty and live a better life. The blatant disregard for how medicine testing these on wellbeing would wreck children’s lives proves the fact that policy is definitely callous and selfish.
In society really for people to discriminate and stigmatize drug addicts. They are stereotyped since lazy in reality, medicine addiction can be described as disease that requires treatment. A person hooked on drugs cannot simply leave when they want to. Continuing drug work with changes the chemistry with the brain, alters its framework and its capability to function normally. Moreover, pictures taken of drug addicts’ brains show that the areas that are essential for proper view, and behaviour control are greatly broken.
Once somebody is dependent on drugs it truly is no longer a conscious decision to use, but something their very own body has to function. It really is wrong to discriminate against addicts because it is first and foremost, a condition, just like any other mental illness and there must not be any judgment attached to this. Therefore , entrance into a medically supervised treatment centre is necessary so depriving them of that addict’s only source of income will not make them in any way and can only bring about an increase in the homeless population.
It is possible that some people in welfare can be waiting to get into a treatment system and require the money to support themselves while they do thus. The blatant disregard the fact that policy of drug assessment welfare recipients has pertaining to the physical and neurological effects that drug addiction has on a person evidently indicates the callousness and discrimination that the policy illustrates. The final and most important disagreement is that medicine testing does not save any cash. In fact that wastes it. The entire thought for drug testing is the fact drug user’s assistance could possibly be terminated, and therefore save taxpayers from losing their money however , this is not the case.
The costs of producing and applying the testing have shown to cost more cash than the government authorities saved from terminating these found to have been using drugs. Utah spent $30 000 drug testing people on welfare in support of 12 people tested positive. Similarly, just 2% of people receiving federal government assistance in Florida failed the test, compared to national drug usage charge of 8% (Covert).
This kind of suggests that almost all drug users are not these living in lower income, and shows the unjust discrimination they will face. In addition , a recent New york city Times article stated that testing in Florida expense the government an extra $45 780, which is grossly wasteful. Equally, out of the eight states which have been enforcing legislation, non-e are saving money.
In Arizona, only 1 person in 3 years tested positive (Kelly). Every single examine done has demonstrated that the state governments will be losing money nevertheless more and more claims are suggesting it and citizens of Canada happen to be pushing because of it as well. By 2013, 30 states possess proposed the legislation, which is completely nonsensical. If no money is being kept, why are many people behind the policy?
The sole possible cause has to be selfishness and the reluctance of citizens for their taxation to be going toward many other citizens less fortunate than themselves. This exemplifies how drug testing the indegent is simply a symptom of discrimination in society and never a means to save money. With all of the evidence considered, there is absolutely no rebutting the fact that drug testing to be eligible for welfare is callous and nothing nevertheless a symptom of discrimination and selfishness in society. The testing punishes kids, which is unjust, ignores the truth that drug addiction is a disease and the most significantly, doesn’t save any cash. So many people are supporting this legislation but becoming poor must not result in someone being defined as less than and a delinquent.
It is unfair that the just standing reason for implementing or sustaining laws and regulations requiring medicine testing is that people don’t want their cash going to the less fortunate that eventually, need it for survival. For any person that helps these regulations the main query that should be thought about is why? So why should the poor end up being drug examined when everyone receives federal government funds in a single way yet another?
The fact is, they should not. Bibliography Covert, Bryce. “Utah Spent More Than $30, 000 To Catch doze Drug Users On Welfare. ” ThinkProgress RSS. D. p., and. d. Net. 24 Scar. 2014.
Kelly, Brian L. “An Baladi, Money-eating Sham: Drug Tests for Wellbeing a Huge Failure. ” Saloncom RSS. D. p., 29 Aug. 2013. Web. twenty-three Mar. 2014.
Richey, Kate. “Five Reasons Not to Drug-test. ” Ok Policy Company. N. g., n. m. Web. twenty-four Mar. 2014