Faulkner f o connor the dissertation
Excerpt from Composition:
But the friction between her and her mother translated also to the contemporary society, to the ‘good country persons. ‘ The favorable country people, represented by Manley Pointer, turned against her, victimizing her through the use of her very own ideals and beliefs. Manley took advantage of her ‘weakness, ‘ having the capacity to see through her tough personal, knowing that within her, there is also a part of her that needed attention and love devoid of pity. O’Connor may have portrayed Manley to be truly taken by Joy/Hulga’s sulkiness and believed her to be like him, the kind of ‘good country person’ whom knew and experienced the harshness of life. This could be verified in his remark after he ‘revealed’ himself to Joy/Hulga, exclaiming to her, “[w]hat’s the matter together of a unexpected? You just a while ago said you didn’t rely on nothing. I think you was some lady! ” (par. 139).
Although Emily and Joy/Hulga shared the same destiny (both knowledgeable ‘the fall’) and had been characterized since abrasive persons towards all their society, Faulkner and O’Connor used imaginary elements in different ways to illustrate each character’s downfall. The plot composition, for one, originated differently. O’Connor, on one hand, decided to show his use of irony – the worldly Joy/Hulga being played and tricked by the worldlier Pointer – at the end from the story, offering it a surprising closing. Faulkner, alternatively, explicitly stated Emily’s end at the start with the story, and worked toward establishing the suspense and surprising death of another character inside the story: Homer Barron. Hence, focusing on Emily’s character by itself, Faulkner used an upside down structure to develop the story of the story, but sought to harmony this inverted structure by simply developing a frequently structured history plot intended for Homer’s figure.
The third fictional element which is used to support the theme of the downfall of the characters Emily and Joy/Hulga is the point-of-view (POV). POV is powerfully used in the stories as it helped strengthen the claim that there was scrubbing between the main character and her contemporary society. It was through POV which the readers/audience understood the scrubbing that existed between Emily and her town, since illustrated in the antagonistic tone of the Narrator, who represents the townspeople. Interestingly, Emily was characterized and the tale developed depending on the Narrator’s POV alone. This ‘outside looking in’ or third-person POV is definitely an ingenious strategy that Faulkner did to fret the importance that Emily’s city played in portraying her as the “fallen monument” the town believed her to become. Conversely, O’Connor used the first person POV, using each character’s contact lens as the voices that constructed their own character. In Joy/Hulga’s circumstance, her thoughts against Mrs. Hopewell and her own thoughts helped develop her worldly and surly personality, solidifying her character for the point that readers appear sorry on her after Pointer made a fool out of her by ‘stealing’ her manufactured leg, rendering it his ‘memento’ of Joy/Hulga (par. 142).
In effect, throughout the characters, plot structure, and point-of-view, Faulkner and O’Connor successfully conveyed to their readers/audience the theme of their heroines’ downfall, via high morality and idealism, to moral degeneration and disillusionment. These ingredients of fictional supported this dominant theme of the short stories, highlighting points of similarities and differences between the writers’ styles as well as the characters’ roles on the overall advancement and achievement of the brief stories.
Faulkner, W. E-text of “A Rose for Emily. ” Accessed about 8 Nov 2008. Offered by http://www.ariyam.com/docs/lit/wf_rose.html.
O’Connor, F. E-text of “Good Country Persons. ” Utilized on almost 8 November 2008. Available at http://us.geocities.com/cyber_explorer99/oconnorgoodcountry.html.