Juggling Motor Skill Essay

Essay Topic: Essay, Skill, Spanish student,

Paper type: Learning,

Words: 1576 | Published: 01.25.20 | Views: 327 | Download now

To higher understand learning, the research and experimentation was conducted by a student.

The objective of this research was to examine a novice learner doing a skill, through which improvement, retention, consistency, flexibility and periods of learning would be examined. The individual decided to go with juggling 3 beanbags pertaining to the skill to be learned. The subject were required to learn how to juggle three beanbags at once employing both hands.

Practice was completed in one way to keep consistency; this included tossing small beanbags standing up in the same space. Hypothesis from the experimenter advised greatest improvement of skill in the beginning to middle of testing. Learning would be achieved. An increase in practice time and power would need to arise for additional improvement. Putting learning into point of view, Fitts and Posner Theory will help explain three fundamental stages of learning; verbal-cognitive, motor-associative, and autonomous.

Verbal-cognitive is the first stage of learning. Attributes of the newbie stage incorporate: high focus during motion, fatigue which usually reduces examples of freedom and performance, the novice needs opinions and a static correction, and spoken cues in many cases are necessary for learning. The second stage of learning, motor-associative, is where functionality is most improved.

Characteristics on this stage incorporate: feedback is usually acknowledged, yet cannot be physically corrected, important movements are established, degrees of freedom will be increased, and diversification of skill is completed to improve learning. The last stage of learning, according to Fitts and Posner’s theory, is the autonomous stage. Learning is subconscious, which means intellectual thought can be not needed the moment completing movements. Other features of the autonomous stage include: exploiting degrees of freedom, focusing on the most relevant stimuli, and error static correction. Three levels of learning are accomplished in modern order while using first two stages obtainable in a matter of times or several weeks, while the previous stage generally takes years to achieve.

Analysis showed the consumer went through the first two stages of learning. During the beginning base session, initial stage of learning was evident since when the beanbags were thrown or chucked towards the furthermore inaccurately, that caused inconsistent scores. With practice, trainees progressed towards the second level of learning. Juggling became more accurate, easier, and results improved. Recognition of mistakes became noticeable because written evidence by individual stated error detection, but person did not understand how to make physical correction.

Students felt much more comfortable with juggling motion to become confident in ability. After practice session 6, benefits plateaued and showed specific performance struggling to increase until practice patterns intensified. 4 ways to measure motor learning were given to understand test out results. Initial, the student drawn performance figure on graphs to observe improvement.

Second, preservation of skill was measured to decrease functionality variables and measure determination of skill across period. Third, transfer of skill was used to have skill versatile results. Student was able to transfer skill of juggling beanbags to oranges. Fourth, stats were worked out to find standard deviation, which usually showed regularity of skill learning.

Techniques to complete the juggling experiment, the student applied the same three beanbags to accomplish the skill. All periods were performed in the same room with closed house windows and sealed door to stop environmental distractions. The number of draws were counted as measurements and problems were no catches.

Measurements were correct each primary, retention, practice, transfer and gratification sessions of experiment. The independent changing was practice. Learner tried to keep throwing motion and hand movement the same for each and every trial intended for maximum learning. Scoring was also identical throughout every single trial. Following each capture there was a score of just one.

Although the results were really low, after the ten weeks, the number or rating increased considerably with more practice. The reliant variables were the attracts and errors made. Base session, not any practice of skill ahead of session, was first recorded to observe students’ potential before practice. Juggling practice consisted of twelve to fifteen and 25 minute daily practice sessions depending on learner’s daily timetable. Eight hours of practice were to be finished by end of motor unit learning research.

Practice was conducted in one certain approach to better show the learning data. Standing in similar room, facing the same way, closed doors and windows. After practice completing one total hour, student waited fifteen minutes before executing a functionality session.

Total of ten performance periods were gathered throughout try things out. Retention period was examined five days after eighth functionality session to measure persistence of learning. Transfer period was as well conducted to measure flexibility of skill to additional versions of skill.

Info from base, performance, retention, and transfer sessions was recorded on paper by learner, and then transferred into Microsoft Stand out and Ms Word for more analysis. Outcome was put into a formula and answers were plotted on graphs to observe student novice. Standard change was as well calculated to observe consistency of student learning.

The purpose of this kind of study was going to measure levels of learning, improvement, persistence, retention, and adaptability results of the novice learning. Juggling was tested in the learner and, as hypothesized, the spanish student achieved highest learning at the start to middle of assessment. Learning was based on comes from data collection, analysis, and comparison of base, performance, transfer, and preservation sessions.

Primary session and retention program scores had been put into the formula, [(A-B) as well as A)] x 90, to see just how much learning took place during assessment. According to the calculations of quality mean functionality, 70% of juggling was learned once baseline treatment was when compared to retention period. The same formula also compared performance treatment one to functionality session 8 and performance session eight into a transfer session. Performance program one when compared with performance period eight confirmed how much the learner superior skill during experiment, that was 57% improvement.

Results from additional test stats, consistency and improvement, as well confirmed scholar learning. Regular deviation was calculated to depict regularity for all 8-10 performance periods, baseline session, and retention session. The closer the amount was to absolutely no, the more consistent the learner’s accuracy.

Calculations showed highest standard deviation to be 1 ) 83 in performance session three while the lowest was. 95 in performance treatment four confirming consistent ends in improvement over the course of skill learning. Graphs showed how improvement was displayed by quality mean activities of all ten performance classes, baseline period, retention period, and copy session. Quality mean overall performance was identified by adding up scores coming from all ten trials in each treatment and dividing the number by simply ten studies.

Based on data collection and analysis, trainees learned the motor skill of juggling. According to results, the learner developed through the initial stage of learning, verbal-cognitive, and come to a level of skill at the second stage of learning, motor-associative. The initial stage of learning can be where the college student began skill of balancing.

Gripping and throwing the beanbags had taken high focus and finely-detailed to accurately toss to the other hand. Tests 8, on the lookout for, and 15 in functionality sessions one and two were tough for the learner since fatigue became a factor in creating poor performance. Responses and correction was noticeable in which the learner cognitively replayed performance in order to improve.

With practice, the learner started learning the best hand moves to have better aim. While the learner improved, improvement was made for the second stage of learning. The most improvement occurred in overall performance sessions two through 4. Learner became accustomed to tossing the beanbags to the furthermore without a lots of thought. Problem detection was easily produced, but modification was still tough for the learner to correct. Repetition of skill increased performance and learner became comfortable producing the hands movements and creating less errors.

A mass of accuracy rose until efficiency session half a dozen, where spanish student reached a plateau. Level was reached, but can possibly be avoided with intense, diverse practice and experience. Another model of electric motor learning, Vereijkens, can be used to decide if student learned.

Vereijkens model involves three stages of learning; cold degrees of freedom, releasing degrees of freedom, and exploiting degrees of freedom. The first two stages can be related to how a student learned to toss bags to the opposite side. The novice began inside the freezing degrees of freedom level. Upper body impetus of student was as well used to chuck dart in a more specific area of the dartboard. Improvement in scores resulted from the spanish student detecting errors in practice.

The, however , could hardly correct mistakes without guidance. Accuracy improved with more flexibility movement in arm. The final stage, taking advantage of degrees of independence, was not seen by the spanish student. Stages of learning, improvement, student consistency of learning, retention capability, and adaptability every confirmed pupil learning. The learner hypothesis held authentic, in which improvement would happen greatly coming from beginning to middle section testing stages.

Experience and repetition is needed to attain excessive levels of learning and keep ability. The analysis showed just how learning may be attained through practice and persistence of accomplishing a skill.

Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!