Jung carl jung theory research paper

Myersbriggs Type Indicator, Jung, Psychoanalytic Theory, Attachment Theory

Excerpt via Research Conventional paper:

The self, then, does not control from individual experience but instead from what has been known as “early psychosomatic unity” (Urban 2008).

The existence of these various archetypes – the shadow, the anima/animus, the mom, etc . – in all people is evidence for Jung’s concept of the collective subconscious. These common archetypes will not come from specific experiences or perhaps conscious awareness. Instead, they may be entirely unconscious and within all people, no matter background, culture, or life experience. Is it doesn’t unification of the archetypes in our own awareness that allows us to develop a feeling of self.

Myers-Briggs

Jung’s ideas about individuality types include found their way right into a popular and widely used individuality “test”: the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. This assessment was crafted based on Jung’s individuality theories. This begins together with the assumption that “much seemingly random deviation in actions are actually quite orderly and consistent, becoming due to standard differences in many ways individuals opt to use their perception and judgment. inch (Myers Briggs). As referred to above, these ideas stem directly from Jung. Following the syndication of his book Mental Types, two American women sought to integrate Jung’s complex internal ideas into everyday life. They will felt that his input were as well powerful to be limited to the narrow educational community.

Today, the Myers-Briggs Personality Check is used in corporate and group settings around the world. It provides a evaluation whereby persons can discover themselves along four matrices: extroverted – introverted, thinking – feeling, sensing – intuiting, and judging – perceiving. Through a series of inquiries, individuals are able to express their preferences in how they perceive the world, take in data, make decisions, and do something. Each person whom completes the Myers-Briggs evaluation will come apart with their own “personality type, ” a summary code of four letters that condenses Jung’s complex psychological theories into a useable structure. Many statement that having this information helps them be more aware of their particular personality as well as the personality of friends and family members. It can be used as being a team-building application and may successfully reduce conflict by increasing inter-personal understanding and acceptance.

Summary: Jung’s Theory Individuality

Jung’s work explains character, and later thinkers, including Myers and Briggs, have made these links more accessible. Instead of being exclusively the product of the life’s experiences, or even our personal family’s genes, our character is firmly influenced simply by timeless archetypal patterns which have been similar throughout cultures. Four functions are normal to all people in the way they will interact with the world: sensing, thinking, intuiting, and feeling. Each of these factors exists in all persons, but we all also have what Jung called a “superior” function that is better developed for us and therefore becomes our principal mode of interaction (Boeree).

It is, after that, the discussion of these archetypes – the animus / anima plus the shadow, such as – with our own personal experience that kind our exceptional personalities. We may have inborn tendencies to experience the world especially ways as well as to learn and express themselves in certain methods. These inclinations must be thought as the product from the collective subconscious as construed through our personal experiences with individuation. This method may give “specific meaning to a person’s identity” (Roesler). The greater a person invests in understanding his or her personal archetypal subconscious – through psychoanalysis – the better equipped s/he will be to succeed at the tough process of individuation and embody the personal. Individual personality attributes are thus a product of the collective unconscious, our own knowledge of how these factors can be found within all of us, and the personal existence experiences.

Therefore, the idea of the multiple choice format once again becomes valuable. Individuals have natural personal preferences and advantages and may are pulled to a single set of archetypal identities over others. But those traits are controlled by change, and through division people may well experience transformative personality modifications.

A Analyze

Jung’s hypotheses on psychoanalysis have had a long-lasting impact on the field. Various psychologists practice Jungian research, and the terms “archetype” and “collective unconscious” have become popular. Such different disciplines while business, political science, and sociology carry on and rely on Jung’s insights to guide their own query. However , there are two fundamental problems with the usage of Jung’s hypotheses to an understanding of personality creation.

First, his theories themselves are circular. This individual argues the fact that collective subconscious is comprised of archetypes then, later, that the existence of those archetypes is definitely evidence pertaining to the communautaire unconscious. This can be like citing himself since proof of the validity of his function. In other words, his theories shortage concrete data. How can we “prove” the collective unconscious exists? How could we make certain that spending years probing it through evaluation and trying to individuate will probably be any more effective than other kinds of counseling, or perhaps non-e in any way? His hypotheses, then, might lack evidence and may certainly not be applicable to life.

Secondly, even if all of us accept the validity of his ideas for psychoanalysis, they are also spiritual and faith-based pertaining to my preference. His approach to understanding personality does not look like based in research; rather, this pulls via such “mushy” disciplines while astrology and spirituality. Many scientists are generally not convinced why these disciplines offer a sound basis for understanding something as medically intricate as a persons brain as well as the formation of personality.

Realization

Despite this review and the recognized short-comings of Jung’s assumptive approach to mindset, his observations are important for understanding personality development. We emerge from his work with a sense that our personalities possess both static and dynamic elements. When ever young, for example , we may are likely toward introversion and feeling modes of learning. We may connect with the archetype of the mother. But since we era and encounter individuation, the personality may also shift. We may become more comfortable and extroverted. We may learn how to think analytically and critically, and therefore rely less upon our sense skills for learning. And that we may break away from the comfort with the mother archetype and find ourself more touching our own shadow. This Jungian roadmap through personality development is powerful and, like the collective unconscious, timeless.

Bibliography

Boeree, George. (2006). Carl Jung. Sold at:

http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/jung.html

Heffner, Christopher D. (2002). Carl Jung’s Inductive Psychology. Chapter 5 in Personality Summary. Available at: http://allpsych.com/personalitysynopsis/jung.html

Hillman, Wayne. (1960) The parable of Analysis: Three Essays in Archetypal Psychology.

Northwestern University Press: Evanston, Ill.

Jung, C. G. (1953). The Archetypes plus the Collective Unconscious (Collected Functions of C. G. Jung, Vol 8 Part I). Pantheon Books.

Jungian A fortiori Praxis, Inc. (2010). Division: The Process of an entire life. Available at: http://www.jungiananalyticpraxis.com/individuation_lecture.htm

Roesler, Christian. (2006). A Narratological Methodology for Figuring out Archetypal

History Patterns in Autobiographical Narratives. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 51: 574-586.

Schueler, Gerald. (1997). Division. Available at:

http://www.schuelers.com/ChaosPsyche/part_1_27.htm

The Myers-Briggs Foundation. Offered at: http://www.myersbriggs.org/

Downtown, Elizabeth. (2008). The ‘Self’ in Synthetic Psychology: The Function with the ‘Central Archetype’ Within Fordham’s Model. Log of Deductive Psychology, 53: 329-350.

Tweet