Nationalism And Sectionalism Essay

The Age of Good Sense: The Effects and Consequences of Nationalism and Sectionalism In 1815, soon before the commence of James Monroe’s presidency and after the War of 1812, a historical period known as the “Era of Good Feeling” commenced in the usa. However , although name of this age alone insinuated a period of unity and success within the land, sectionalism started to be an unequivocal dilemma that seeped through the government’s efforts in promoting nationalism, and in the end divided the nation.

The Period of Good Sense was a time where only one political party reigned, feeling of oneness prevailed, and national pleasure was obvious within the residents. This post­war nationalism motivated the country to work towards one common goal, as well as encouraged creation of practices that would be passed down generations. The McCulloch versus. Maryland case in 1819 exhibits government’s attempt in putting up a unified front to further enhance nationalism.

In this case, the Congress’ power is usually questioned if the ruling prevented states from outlawing or taxing the national financial institution, as Maryland tried to do. The file states, “The power of the typical government, it is often said, are delegated by the states, who alone happen to be truly sovereign” (Document 4). However , the outcome of the case only came to show that the government had good luck compared to the state government, and thus described a stronger, unified system. In Document 3, people are portrayed to be celebrating Self-reliance Day on the fourth of July inside the same 12 months of the case.

This depicts the effect that nationwide pride had, bringing together multiple races, genders, social classes, and age groups to celebrate the country’s self-reliance. Furthermore, this era as well brought on a fundamental period in America known as the Industrial Trend. This launched market overall economy to the inhabitants and moved forward America to manufacturing processes that brought economic benefits to the north.

Market economy not only improved the way persons worked, although also the way they lived, since it divided labor, based work in factories, and opened fresh markets like the American Hair Company. As a result of prior Rintangan Act, merchants also invested in national regional manufacturing, and thus allowed for the rapid advancement urban areas and increase in population. That brought riches to the North’s market­based overall economy but contradicted with the South’s focus on a great agricultural economy that counted on slaves.

One of the most significant developments within the country was presented shortly after the War of 1812, by simply politician Holly Clay, as the American System. The plan promoted something in which the Southern was seen to be the producer of uncooked goods, North for the manufacturing, even though the West since the breadbasket of the nation. It consisted of three parts: the development of canals, road systems and railroads, creation of the protective tariff, and the reinstating of the Lender of U. S..

The North prospered from the creation of the contract price as it helped develop the manufacturing economic climate. The Western, on the other hand, benefitted from the creation of road and canal system, a plan supported by David C. Calhoun, in order to prevent disunion inside the rapidly growing region, (Document 2). These developments in vehicles allowed for simpler distribution of products, thus benefitting them too.

However , the protective tariff prevented the South’s economic climate from growing, thus bringing about an apparent economic distance between the North and the Southern, as the former’s economy started to growth due to the embrace manufacturing.

Tweet