Organization theory management theory management
Excerpt via Term Daily news:
A lot more, strong theory should way micro techniques, if necessary. In some situations, strong theory leads to directions that cannot be observed without the by using a theory.
Concerning organizational theory, contributors to building the basis of solid theory from this field incorporate: Frederick Winslow Taylor (who studied human being behavior at your workplace using a systematic approach), Elton Mayo (who focused on the emotional part of staff and how it affects their very own work), Jane Parker Follett (who marketed positive motivation for employees), Douglas McGregor (Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 2007).
Regarding strong theory, Karl Elizabeth. Weick’s view is in some way more complex than that of Sutton and Staw. The theorizing model that he proposes is based on the idea that theory construction involves creativeness, kept in order by the processes of manufactured selection (Weick, 1989). Weick’s contribution to organizational theory resides in the approach he developed to describe the process utilized in collecting, managing, and using the information received by businesses. This approach is dependent on focusing not really on the structure, but around the process. In his book the Social Mindset of Organizing, Weick used two previously proven hypotheses to support his own theory and to add credibility and importance to it. The theories he used were: General Program Theory and Darwin’s Theory of Development (Gadachy, 2001).
In conclusion, regardless of the field that refers to, good theory must meet several requirements, regardless if, basically, there will be no consensus about what theory actually is or perhaps what it should be. These requirements include simpleness, interconnectedness, clearness, providing logical arguments, which includes past assumptive work. Nevertheless , it seems being much easier to determine what weak theory is. Inside the weak theory category, one particular must incorporate: references, list of variables, ideas, and blueprints. These instrument are not ineffective, they are only insufficient in the event used alone. However , they are really very helpful in developing solid theory, in supporting that, in broadening it, in broadening the directions strong theory follows, and on screening strong theory.
Sutton, R. Staw, B. (1995). What Theory Is Not really? Notes. Recovered January 16, 2008 at http://www.stanford.edu/~jchong/articles/msande380/Sutton%20and%20Staw%20-%20What%20Theory%20is%20Not.pdf.
Recklies, Dagmar (2001). Management Models – what they can perform and the actual cannot perform. The Supervisor. Recklies Management Project GmbH. Retrieved January 14, 2008 at http://www.themanager.org/resources/Managementmodels.htm.
Rothman, Steven (2004). Records on Explanatory Typologies in the Qualitative Research of Foreign Politics. Foreign Organization. Recovered January 13, 2008 for http://www.uoregon.edu/~srothma1/QualMethods/Notes-ExplanatoryTypologicalTheory.pdf.
Organizational studies (2007). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved January 14, 08 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_studies.
Sutton, L. Staw, N. (1995). What Theory Is usually Not. Administrative Science Quarterly. Retrieved January 14, 08 at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4035/is_n3_v40/ai_17781733/pg_6.
Weick, Karl E. (1989). Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination. Summary. Retrieved January 14, 08 at http://www.stanford.edu/~jchong/articles/msande380/Weick%20-%20Theory%20Construct%20as%20Disciplined%20Imagination.pdf.
Gadachy, Eileen (2001). Organizational Information Theory. Colorado Condition University. Recovered January 16, 2008 by http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Speech/rccs/theory43.htm.