Social Learning Theory Essay

Essay Topic: Criminal offenses, Essay, Learning, Learning theory, Social, Theory, This individual,

Paper type: Learning,

Words: 5787 | Published: 11.05.19 | Views: 712 | Download now

Abstract Social Learning Theory is actually a theory that is used in dealing with learning from the learning set up to criminal purchase behavior. Just as much as the theory can be not enough by itself, they have considerably prevailed to address the reasons, prediction, avoidance and the felony justice approach to criminal behaviours. This paper uses a circumstance of a hardcore criminal showing the events perpetrated by the lawbreaker, how they could have been forecasted and avoided.

It gives advice on some of the strategies to be used in implementing the felony justice program in regard to the usage of social learning theory. Essentially, it recides on the way the idea help to decrease criminal behaviours. Introduction Interpersonal learning theory is a theory that offers evidence of obtain, maintenance and alter in legal and deviant behavior that embraces cultural, non-social and cultural factors operating equally to encourage and control criminal tendencies and challenge conformity. The theory goes beyond explaining why criminal offenses is done and also explains so why it is not carried out. The theory facilitates a protecting and a preventive aspect too.

Commitment of criminal offenses is a sophisticated issue this kind of its trigger leaves more questions unanswered. The event in question is the certainly one of a one Sue Ikeri Matheri who was raised in a humble family to become a notorious-most wanted man in the country- having been later searched by law enforcement and wiped out. Matheri was a gang leader of a team whose one of many member determined suicide following the news of Matheri’s loss of life was aired. This reveals the magnitude of the fear and fanatism that this individual carried inside the gang. He committed several murders and robberies yet unfortunately perished poor.

Besides normal robberies, his crimes involved even raping his victims. He could be a man in whose name was feared to get mentioned simply by villagers since if a single mentioned him to the specialist he or she will be killed in cold blood vessels. His real cause of robberies was not basically identified. In spite of being involved with bank robberies- involving countless shillings- this individual did not have got any opportunities or property in his name.

He dropped his school in yr six and might be this contributed to his destiny. His associates had been people who had been feared inside the society and this made it challenging for the safety personalities to identify where he was and thus permitting him land on the loose for five year. Matheri’s story indeed shows that prevention of such networked kind of crime is not easy since offense might emanate from because an early era behavior as according to his dad, despite certainly not showing truancy in his days and nights in school he just wakes one day and decide to leave school. The society by which this lawbreaker came from may be a hub of crooks.

So , using the Social Learning Theory, we could insinuate that Matheri was an observer in the incidents in his area and thus decided to go with wrong versions hence turning out to be the notorious thug having been. Social learning theory simply by Ronald Akers and Robert Burgess developed this theory to explain this deviancy searching at the parameters that urged criminal patterns with those that discourage criminal behavior. Relating to this theory social learning occur in various ways including; close contact, fake of managers, understanding ideas, role version behavior and insertion.

It also goes a head and bring out that learning in social environment depends on ethnical conflict among different factions in the world. People usually believe that they will observe interpersonal learning through parenting, that is certainly, by observing how other folks influence their children and their children influence others but if this is true then the concern of innate motivation is definitely not dealt with. Social learning theory facilitates the use of the utilization of punishment converting to for a longer time sentences for anyone convicted.

The proponents argue that criminal manners is discovered both in cultural and nonsocial situations which can be reinforcing and discriminative. Encouragement in this case refers to the benefits which the criminals receive after carrying out the criminal offense. The theory part of the learning of legal behavior occurs in all those groups which will compromise the individual’s key source of strengthening.

The learning of a criminal tendencies including specific techniques attitudes and elimination procedures can be described as function of effective and available reinforces and existing reinforcement. Using this event it can be clear that criminal actions are a function of norms, that happen to be discriminative for criminal tendencies, the learning of which takes place when such behavior is more extremely reinforced than noncriminal behavior as in the society Matheri lived in, a few rich persons attributes their very own wealth to criminal activities. This can partly explain so why the area can be prone to high crime level, since it may be insinuated the criminal may be identifying these unscrupulous persons as their models.

This go with the notion of Interpersonal Learning theory proponents whom posited that there was a process in which norms discriminated for delinquency and that behavior was then sturdy. But in the case of Matheri it is cannot be identified what his strengthening was since he did not have the money this individual ought to have had when he fulfilled his death. Strength of criminal actions are a direct function of the quantity, frequency, and probability of its strengthening. The advocates proposed that when there is an increase in amount of reinforcement, there is an increase in the response price.

The theory may be applied to most criminals and crimes that produce a gain (in terms of money), but it is the most suitable applied to behavior within groups- like that of Matheri, draw you he was a team leader- which offer reinforcement, such as gangs, peer or interpersonal groups. The gain must be psychological, at the. g. positive attention from all other group member, or material, e. g. what was thieved. The attention Matheri might have received from the associates was tremendous since even one fully commited suicide on hearing this news of his leader’s death.

The degree of great reinforcement can determine if the behavior is ongoing or certainly not. The individual dissimilarities may be biological, psychological, or the result of elements; and these types of differences may possibly affect the connection between individual and sociable group. The theory is therefore expanded simply by explaining criminal offenses as function social learning in interpersonal structure.

Though the theory gives a basis intended for crime commitment, it continue to does not make clear how an individual first satisfies people that display criminal actions. The theory does not explain just how people who have certainly not been associating with criminals still become criminals, for instance, Matheri’s instructors at a young age provided an account showing how he was a quiet young man who may go unnoticed.

The theory will not explain how criminal actions are transmitted in one person to a different, which can make clear increases in types of crimes, nevertheless does not consider how criminal offenses can be eliminated although it may be fairly presumed that the means of learning manners can be altered. (Cited in Burgess & Akers, 1966, p. 128-147) Social Learning theory has become has been employed in mentoring applications that should in theory, prevent some future criminal behavior. This kind of theory consequently leaves a lot of questions not answered and manifests the multiple proportions of the complicated crime happening.

In this daily news, social learning theory could be elaborated to account for offences and sociological irregularities, producing sense for events not simply at micro level although also for high levels of temporal and ecological out and out aggression, providing a better explanation than other theories. Section One Etiology The reasons persons give for doing or participating in criminal offenses are since complex as human mind. Etiology is the study of causation- the production of an effect by trigger.

Social learning theory may explain just how people often are reinforced for modeling the behaviours of others and so suggesting which the environment likewise reinforces modeling. It is observed in the events of Matheri that mostly environmental surroundings in which this individual lived in written for him learning to be a hardcore criminal. In Matheri’s case building was made by the adults he might have been admiring when he was young.

The theory implies that the observer is strong by the style; the imitated behavior alone leads to rewarding consequences. Various behaviors learned produce satisfying or reinforcing results. Outcomes of versions behaviours impact the observer similar to the case of Matheri his death might affect an observer who had been looking at him as a version. Learning without performance the distinction between learning through observation as well as the actual counterfeit of what has been discovered. It can be seen that indeed the viewer and sometimes the followers in the model similar to the case of Matheri a great accomplice dedicated suicide following their frontrunners death which means that he was looking up to him as a role model who had been to be emulated.

This for that reason confirms that, indeed, modeling contributes to purchase and progress criminal actions and building can for that reason lead to development of positive manners.. As a result of becoming reinforced, people form anticipations about the results the future behaviours are likely to take. They expect certain behaviours to bring abuse and other to create reinforcement. As in the case of Matheri the accomplice could not stand the outcomes of their actions that is why these were either on the run and at least one committed suicide.

This kind of shows, in line with the theory the fact that learner has to be aware of the response reinforcements and response punishment. Strengthening increases a response in lawbreaker behavior only if the spanish student is aware of that connection then the spanish student has the familiarity with the encouragement. Further the theory looks at testing causation which proposes that behavior may influence both environment plus the person. Actually each of these 3 variables, the person, behavior, plus the environment may have an impact on each additional. Behaviors which can be learned through modeling; for example, students observing parents examining; students can observe a demonstration of mathematics issue.

The same applies intended for criminals to be as they watch their types. Though, in the case of Matheri we all cannot level a ring finger at an auto dvd unit, it is mainly he had one who actually create goals for him. Aggression may be learnt through models.

Kids become hostile when they observe aggressive or perhaps violent models. For instance, meaning thinking and moral habit are affected by remark and modeling. This includes moral judgments regarding right and wrong, that may in part, develop through modeling.

So this implies that if an observer observes legal type judgments and probe he will probably fall victim to felony behaviors. A few conditions are necessary for a successful modeling. Interest is one of the conditions necessary for modeling. For a habit to be learned there should be a qualification of interest.

The second state is preservation where the viewer must be in a position to remember the behavior that has been noticed. One way of increasing this is using the technique of rehearsal. In the event of criminal habit, it is stored by applying a criminal activity first as a trial then follows with another one following the success of the fist one particular. The third condition is motor unit reproduction which involves the ability to replicate the behavior which the model provides demonstrated. Which means that the viewer has to be capable to replicate the action, which could be a issue with a spanish student who is certainly not ready early childhood to reproduce the actions.

For instance little ones have difficulty undertaking complex physical motions. Inside the crime situation, an novice criminal will not be ready to commit a criminal behavior as a result of various causes including not enough techniques like use of firearms thus conclude to be a mugger. Finally an additional ingredient to get modeling is usually motivation.

Determination is a required ingredient pertaining to modeling to happen. Learners should yearn for to demonstrate the actual have learned and in addition they can do this when they are motivated. In social learning theory determination is in sort of reinforcement. Since these 4 conditions differ among persons, different people can reproduce similar behavior differently. Modeling teaches new manners and influences the frequency of past learned behaviours.

Modeling could also discourage previously forbidden behaviours. Like in the situation of Matheri the viewer might be disheartened by the criminal’s ending hence not selecting the legal behavior. Modeling sometimes increases the frequency of similar behaviors and thus if the behavior is low criminal patterns then modeling will do good to the culture, unlike when it is a criminal behavior. The same situation can be found in a school placing in extra curricula actions that is, for instance , when a scholar sees a pal excel in basketball this challenges him too and therefore, he tries to excel in football because he is certainly not tall enough for basket ball.

This explains why social learning theory can not only be applied to acquisition of felony behavior although also to other confident behavior just like correction of delinquency actions and thus can be used in prisons. Some of the elements that impact crime have family influences such as broken families, physical violence in homes, poor child raring, if the parent will not know who have their children affiliates with hence leading to wrong companies. Furthermore when parents are criminals the youngsters might adhere to suite.

Kids who will be brought up in a violent environment tend to always be violent if they grow up since they often perceive physical violence as part of existence. For instance when a boy lives to see his mother becoming battled he tend to contemplate that women a feeble creatures and if not really enlightened, may well end up being a wife battler. It is simpler for people to find out from noticing others mainly because after all if they make mistakes they are really much less dangerous. In this way each goes through the actions they observe and then try it out themselves so when they do well they become more confident. A similar scenario happens when all of us interact with the environment, we either change it or perhaps it alterations us.

Thus behavior is learned by observing, thinking and trying. It is indispensable that we study from people all of us identify with; which includes our parents when we are children and later peers. Akers looked over criminal behavior as the principle of operant fitness. This kind of health is troubled by the environmental effects. However Akers and Burgess believe that this eliminates some other sources of rearrangements that do not really require individual interaction.

Basically they argue that learning includes more than social circumstance and thus we have nonsocial reinforcement- may in psychological viewpoint we have the intrinsic inspiration that promotes and specific to learn the actual would in any other case not get inside the environment that they live in( cited in Burgess & Akers, 1966, p. 128-147). Just as stealing or taking people off their property- Matheri way- might not obtain a social strengthening but using the money acquired from the action encourages anybody who increases his criteria of living, thus giving the individual reinforcement through the satisfaction derived from the action. The activities of Matheri show up in the light that he might possess learnt via gang which will he after turned to become the leader.

This is often complimented by argument the fact that principle element of learning legal behavior takes place in organizations in groupings that bargain the individual’s major source of reinforcement. You should this result that Burgess and Akers argue that determination is active in the acquisition of encouragement value with a stimulus. (Cited in Burgess & Akers, 1966, p. 128-147) Section Two Conjecture and Elimination Prediction and prevention of crime are complementary goals. Incarceration is one way of elimination of criminal offenses which goals specific person for the proven commission of a certain offence. It is crucial for criminal offenses preventers to consider location and times when motivated offenders come into contact with susceptible crime targets.

Crime elimination activity should certainly focus after manipulating the society in order to avoid this criminal opportunity. Program criminal activities take place in similar spaces because other activities of other associates of culture. Manipulating the field of offenders alters the world of all of those other population. The extent that interventions effects solely around the offender, or maybe more widely differs across interventions and with the nature of their implementation. According to social learning theory a kind of crime thrives when the gain appears to be always substantial although at least there is a gain.

The gain ranges coming from positive attention from their group or pleasure to materials gain. Similar to the case of Matheri, as being a class 6 drop out, his acts made him fame though in a negative way. One of the means of preventing scammers from their risky acts through providing difficult consequences.

Every one of the apparent support avenues needs to be shut so that even if an unhealthy thug like Matheri shop lifts a lot of cash, this individual cannot financial institution it both in banking institutions or make investments it in stock market devoid of accounting to get the origin with the money. This will deter the observers who would sooner or later sign up for the team. By using the dimensions of differential box association, Interpersonal learning theory can be used to stop future criminal offenses activities by avoiding direct or roundabout association with individuals or teams who present major immediate or advanced social situations in which systems of social learning function.

The theory hypothesizes that the even more an individual’s differential interactions are skewed in the direction of greater exposure to deviant behaviors and attitudes, the greater the possibility the person is always to engage in deviant behavior. It can be deducted that Matheri’s deviant behavior may have started early on in his life but gone unnoticed. Having been known to be noiseless when he was young and hence the parents and teachers wasn’t able to notice who have he was associating with. For this reason even his father wasn’t able to figure out what made him give up school.

Social learning theory basically facets its principles by looking at exactly how the society is a cure all to aid learning. It can be reflected not only in criminal actions but likewise in class room where pupils emulate instructors when studying subjects just like Mathematics. A habit can be prevented to crop up in a class for example counting applying fingers although counting by teacher penalizing those who are determined doing so.

The same approach may be used to prevent offense; where the in cases like this the community can caution those who are perpetrating habits like cheating which afterwards grow to be criminal pursuits like conning. The society should also create an impact that those who abet legal activities happen to be in essence scammers and should always be vilified the same as the criminals themselves. The society in the Matheri case was irate while using activities of Matheri but unfortunately that they started overdue to put pressure on the felony behaviors.

Additionally it is possible that someone who perceived Matheri as a version can not just commit offense since this individual has seen that the society does not captivate this as well as the consequences will be tough. Avoidance of any kind of criminal celebration must be identified from the objective of the legal and the explanation as to why the crime is carried out. In the case of Matheri many concerns remain to answer since he-according to his father was neither greedy nor loved money- and so the motive for him slowly destroying and sometimes eradicating the patients is a great intricate 1. His kinds of crimes had been punctuated with violence which he described even towards the members of his relatives.

In essence his activities could possibly be curbed by may be socializing him with individuals and groups that could bring harmony in his life, but sill there might be the aspect of use of drugs seeing that we are not told in the event that he was applying drugs or perhaps not. Crime prevention entails dealing with scenarios so that problem is less probably. Broad give attention to crime habits, complemented with a micro focus of offender making decisions provide a beneficial combination pertaining to developing reduction strategies. The spate of crimes that occurred in the environment which Matheri came in could be predicted if the criminal offenses patterns and deal with the situation. In this case the upsurge of gangs can be attributed to lack of employment among the youth.

Therefore provision of source of income for the youths will assist a great deal to avoid imminent offences of Matheri’s nature since most offences which are one particular are because of the gains that can come along the offense. A habit to be learned is usually chosen to the strengthening. The rewarding environment and models ought to be curtailed to prevent crime. Alternatively prediction of crimes is an extremely tricky issue.

Dangers can easily arise at the same time of predicting crime. For example, forecasting potential crimes can produce dramatic situations that can inspire the development of heavy handed solutions. The defects of forecasting of forecasting human tendencies should instill caution. The task that develops in prediction of offense is how law remaining citizens will need to accept to be treated since fundamentally untrustworthy until proven otherwise. Section Three Recommended Criminal Rights Responses Encouragement and abuse have indirect effect on learning.

They are certainly not the direct, sole or perhaps main cause. Akers and Burgess suggest that delinquent actions are a result of abnormal definitions in support of delinquent patterns. Their view is area of the process plus the rest of the process is reinforcement. Therefore , it could be argued away that delinquent behavior is not a result of the definitions but amount of reinforcement received.

Reinforcement and punishment effect the level to which an individual exhibits a behavior that is learnt. From your case of Matheri, his search and eventual getting rid of saw him run as a run away meandering so the prior reinforcement was curtailed and fear to get the abuse or outcomes that were anticipating him started to be his rebounding reason for committing crimes learning very well that he could hardly be spared when he can be found. Cultural learning theory proposition is the fact expectations of reinforcement effect cognitive operations that showcase learning. Consequently , attention pays a critical function in learning.

And where the teacher tells the students that whatever we will research next will not come in the exam. The students will never pay attention because they do not anticipate to know the info for the test. Therefore , in case the criminals to be are certain of not any better long term in their interests then they will not go ahead and commit a legal activity.

Self-regulation has become even more emphasized in social learning theory. Personal regulation is definitely when the specific has his ideas as to what is appropriate and in appropriate tendencies and selects actions appropriately reflecting for the benefits that are going to come along with the actions that are the rewarding factor. This can be so mixed to the societal expectations of what is correct or incorrect such that speculate if this trade the freedom to do whatever he wants to perform but inside the societal rules. There are several facets of self control which including setting common goals which are vital in fact it is to this effect that societies come up with laws and regulations that reveal their specifications and objectives.

Criminal rights system uses the concept of goals setting in self analysis by establishing norms and standards that one is required to adhere to in a contemporary society. If these kinds of standards are generally not adhered to then simply an individual is considered to have performed crime. This will likely lead to the culprit to be billed for not adhering to the established standards or breaking the law. Personal observation is essential in personal regulation.

In the Matheri’s world, people have tried to come up with a method to ensure that criminal offense is restrained through community policing (though not carefully implemented but this for least is a step in the ideal direction), the place that the community function hand in hand while using police. Since criminals will be people regarded well for the locals in the neighborhood, this leads to curtailed reinforcement and thus reduction of crime. Home observation provides a close appearance of the kind of criminals should be expected and how to get rid of them from the society as a result making the effort of institutions of felony justice less difficult.

Self judging is a idea of self legislation where the community evaluates themselves by looking for their success, hurdles and predicaments they own come across during their implementation. One more concept in self legislation is personal reaction; personal here refers to the community through which criminals reside in. The way the communities react to felony events features vital importance to the viewer since this might create him to be either fascinated or repelled against criminal offenses. For instance, in case the society glorifies criminals simply by electing those who been alleged to perpetrate legal activity it would be a near impossible factor to encourage the viewer that criminal offenses is poor.

Then the experts will go forward and check out criminal offences afterwards rewarding thus the continuation of crime. Matheri’s society is known to harbor such kind of commanders and thus might be the kind of designs that this contemporary society might be creating. The commanders in that world have been recognized to organize bande in type of sects which in turn terrorize resident and extort money from their store. Therefore it is likely for a culture like this provides up items like Matheri. Promoting self- regulation can be an important technique.

This is usually done by teaching the consumer to praise himself after doing the mandatory or needed behavior. When it comes to Matheri, the society must be reconciliatory by accepting the criminal and present them leave to stay. The ones who surrender should be provided jobs after some training- in the prisons and train the criminals, encourage these people that they can produce it whenever they complete their very own terms and the society is very friendly which is ready to accept them. This really is a sure reinforcement that may lead to a number of cropping up criminals to alter their works. The solution for the crime issue does not rest in the inside the apparent setup like the one implemented to Matheri, but finding the real cause from the problem.

Rather the police will need to use the apprehended criminals in order to avoid the imminent offences. Therefore the justice system has to be entrenched in the society in a way that it adjusts itself become vigilant in identifying criminals. Furthermore the prisons will need to socialize prisoners to enable them to eliminate their deviancies and opt for or master better behaviors. If prisoners could apply the social learning theory by reinforcing positive behaviours, Matheri will not come out more hardened than before.

This is an ideal case of your lapse in on the side from the justice system Monitoring and self support are two ways that people can easily control their own behavior. Initial they monitor and notice their own habit, sometimes even scoring behavior. People may alter behavior by simply reinforcing themselves, by giving or withholding reinforcement. For change to have taken place in Matheri’s case he should always have been rehabilitated in the prison.

It is ridiculous that Matheri’s father potential foods that his son could have learnt to become hardcore criminal the five years having been in jail. This might end up being true bearing in mind the prison Matheri was serving term in is meant for serious criminals, he may have been interested in hardened crooks and thus bringing about him emulating them. We recommend that justice system should have provided for probation intended for first offenders and not directly convicting the culprits for the highest legal prison after their 1st crime. Matheri should have been put on devoir and seen and later collection free if he adjustments his ways or penalized in a correctional centre in the event he would not.

It is also using a lot of concern that after becoming convicted pertaining to five years, the system wasn’t able to establish the true cause of the culprit’s tendencies. It is also recommended that the legal justice system to observe the victims who happen to be convicted and establish what the cause of the criminal actions is and exactly how the environment from where the convicts are originating from contributes within their indulgence to crime. It really is from the knowledge of the cause plus the environment that an individual’s will probably be understood and henceforth fixed. Conclusion The idea is still unable to explain elements that trigger criminal activities which are neither environmental nor social. It is noted that Matheri was an exception in his family.

His temper and penchant intended for violence was unmatched inside the family; he even collection his own house on fire. The theory consequently is certainly not sufficient enough in outlining the reason why this specific criminal socialized like this. Might be the raising a child was wanting since we learn that his dad was typically away and the mother shed track of when ever things began going wrong. The theory refers to the criminal being an observer and imitating the behaviours of his version.

In this case of Matheri we can conclude that he did not have an chance to emulate his father- like the majority of sons do-thus ended up emulating a wrong unit. The theory will not explain just how some one can have a multifaceted character that is being quiet, later makes reasonless decisions of leaving institution and environment his personal house lamplit and eventually to become most needed. Punitive steps are given to many of these so that they can correct their behaviours.

Correctional centers are intended to appropriate people who fully commited crime. Cultural learning theory comes up with organizations that primarily intend to correct criminals in a social circumstance. In a jail situation, prisoners are allowed to consider courses upon various topics so that they can trigger their intellectual process about what is favorably rewarding inside the society. This can be meant to cause them to become to learn and turn better persons in the society after they keep the prisons. After becoming convicted to get five years the culture your father concurs with by saying he anticipated a changed son- anticipated the dropping off of legal behavior and acquisition of behaviours that would enable him being acceptable inside the society yet this was not the case.

Instead he came out like a hardened legal. The theory cannot actually indicate the cause of these kinds of reinforcement. The behaviors of criminals go beyond just learning and societal context. Will there be an inherent possibility of criminal behavior? Why should a person just like Matheri be involved in a spate of robberies involving countless shillings and still die poor?

How could this individual even at times kill but not rob his victims? These questions keep the issue of support unanswered. What was his true reinforcement intended for criminal activities? He was considered to be a tempered person and this still reflects an natural trait. Hence the theory will not exploit the causes of crime.

Social learning theory succeeds in bringing out developmental criminal actions that exhale from cultural group challenges. For instance, one particular might become a member of a group in order to have fun in ingesting. This gradually moves to employing drugs. After learning to make use of drugs, individuals in the group may start petty crimes like pick storage compartments and later graduate student to serious criminals.

This gradual purchase of multiple lawbreaker behaviors can successfully become explained by Cultural learning theory. The theory as well shows how a environment can breed criminals by giving a blind eyesight to felony activities and stump legal activities simply by self managing these situations, implementing a justice program that ensures that individuals pay money for the deeds they do. As an example the contemporary society in which Matheri came from was tired with Matheri’s gang and made a decision to form a vigilante group to function along with the law enforcement officials.

The end result can be described as society with reduced legal activities. For that reason we can deduce that the world actually includes a hand in stopping criminal actions. Matheri’s friends and family had given up on their kin- a needed criminal. Yet this is simply a family that had experienced in price of one of their own. Most of the families deny their particular kin’s participation in criminal offense, even if they may be sure that without a doubt their kin’s are crooks, thus rendering it difficult to stop criminal actions.

In conclusion, cultural learning theory does not solution all reasons for crime; it can be used to prevent criminal activities in particular when the whole culture is given the mandate to self regulate itself. The society will need to monitor, observe, predict and stop criminal actions.

Related posts

Save your time and get your research paper!

Get My Essay